From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA12316 for caml-redist; Fri, 12 May 2000 19:13:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA11653 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Fri, 12 May 2000 19:01:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from hopper.math.uwaterloo.ca (hopper.math.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.78.132])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e4CH13902499
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 12 May 2000 19:01:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from adubey@localhost)
	by hopper.math.uwaterloo.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA03522
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 12 May 2000 13:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Amit Dubey <adubey@hopper.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-Id: <200005121701.NAA03522@hopper.math.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Suggestion: Print more error messages?
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: weis


	Hi,

	I have a short question about error messages.  I've notived that
ocamlc will often quit after detecting the first error.  I find it much
more useful to get a number of errors (at least 3-6), even if some of
them may be spurious.  Is it possible to implement such behaviour?

Thanks,
Amit Dubey