From: Christian RINDERKNECHT <rinderkn@hugo.int-evry.fr>
To: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Syntax for label (and more)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:03:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000317110343.B23125@jones.int-evry.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000315213941.19110@pauillac.inria.fr>; from Xavier Leroy on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 09:39:41PM +0100
> Xavier Leroy wrote:
> - [...] ":" reads nicely, but I'm a bit bothered by having to type "(x : t)"
> for a type constraint rather than "(x: t)". Backward compatibility
> with OLabl is an argument, but backward compatibility with OCaml, Caml
> Light, SML, Classic ML, etc, is a much stronger one!
I fully agree. For instance I found yesterday in the OCaml 2.99
(99/12/08) doc (manual004.html), two "Syntax error" messages due to
this weird lexical rule...
> Looking at the OCaml lexer, the following 1-character symbols are
> (mostly) up for grabs:
> $ (user-definable infix symbol currently)
> % (ditto)
> & (currently deprecated synonymous for &&)
> \ (never used so far)
> ~ (user-definable prefix symbol currently)
> [...]
> Opinions?
They are all right for me.
Cheers,
--
Christian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christian Rinderknecht Phone +33 (0)1 60 76 44 43
Institut National des Télécommunications Fax +33 (0)1 60 76 47 11
Département Logiciels Réseaux (LOR) WWW
9, Rue Charles Fourier, F-91011 Évry Cedex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-17 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-14 16:53 Syntax for label Don Syme
2000-03-14 18:05 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-15 3:15 ` Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-15 6:58 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-15 21:54 ` Julian Assange
2000-03-15 11:56 ` Wolfram Kahl
2000-03-15 13:58 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-15 15:26 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-17 7:44 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-15 17:04 ` John Prevost
2000-03-17 10:11 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-15 17:06 ` Markus Mottl
2000-03-15 19:11 ` Remi VANICAT
2000-03-17 8:30 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-17 14:05 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-17 16:08 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-18 10:32 ` Syntax for label, NEW SOLUTION Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-19 2:29 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-20 18:25 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-22 8:37 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
2000-03-21 23:29 ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-29 8:42 ` Semantic of label: The best (only ?) solution to merge both mode Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-29 9:53 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-30 9:49 ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-30 9:39 ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-31 4:34 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-04-01 1:53 ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-02 19:24 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-04-04 5:50 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-04-03 7:57 ` backward compatibility Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-15 21:30 ` Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL John Max Skaller
2000-03-16 2:55 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-17 15:13 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-17 17:33 ` Wolfram Kahl
2000-03-18 11:59 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-21 16:51 ` Pascal Brisset
2000-03-23 11:14 ` Nicolas barnier
2000-03-24 9:54 ` labels & ocaml 3 & co David Mentré
2000-03-24 12:19 ` David Mentré
2000-03-21 22:22 ` Unsigned integers? John Max Skaller
2000-03-22 16:22 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-23 2:08 ` Max Skaller
2000-03-23 7:50 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-24 2:50 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-24 15:59 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-03-25 4:03 ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-24 14:50 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-03-22 17:05 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2000-03-22 19:10 ` Markus Mottl
2000-03-23 2:41 ` Max Skaller
2000-03-22 19:47 ` Xavier Leroy
2000-03-23 12:55 ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-16 8:50 ` Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL Pascal Brisset
2000-03-17 11:15 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-18 0:04 ` Syntax for label, ANOTHER " Steven Thomson
2000-03-15 20:39 ` Syntax for label (and more) Xavier Leroy
2000-03-17 10:03 ` Christian RINDERKNECHT [this message]
2000-03-17 17:19 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-21 1:29 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000317110343.B23125@jones.int-evry.fr \
--to=rinderkn@hugo.int-evry.fr \
--cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox