From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Preferred GUI Toolkit for O'Caml 3?
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:46:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000222104602Q.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:54:10 +0100 (CET)" <14509.20226.13985.265187@heplix4.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
From: Thorsten Ohl <ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de>
> I soon have to do major surgery (= an almost complete rewrite) on a
> graphical user interface, currently in O'CamlTK.
>
> Since retargeting to incompatible GUIs is such a boring job, I'd like
> to hear which toolkit do you see in your tea leafs as the future
> toolkit of choice?
I answer for the two libraries I'm concerned with.
> - LablTK [ (+) more convenient than O'CamlTK
> (+) part of O'Caml 2.99 ]
This is now an integral part of the ocaml distribution, available on
both Unix and Windows (in ocaml 3.00). The interface should be stable
in the future, making it a good choice if portability and
maintainability matter.
> - lablgtk [ same a mlgtk, plus
> (-) still beta
> (+) appears(!) to have the slickest API ]
Beta does mainly mean that it may undergo API changes in the future.
It is already good enough for writing applications. The next version
will also support Windows.
This is a good choice if appearance matters, and you are ready to
eventually suffer a bit with API changes.
Regards,
Jacques
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Garrigue Kyoto University garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp
<A HREF=http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/>JG</A>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-22 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-18 13:54 Thorsten Ohl
2000-02-21 17:22 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2000-02-22 11:41 ` William Chesters
2000-02-23 7:36 ` Alan Schmitt
2000-02-23 9:24 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-02-24 10:24 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2000-02-25 16:22 ` skaller
2000-02-22 13:41 ` skaller
2000-02-22 14:22 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2000-02-22 1:46 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2000-02-22 13:39 ` skaller
2000-02-22 20:13 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2000-02-22 8:17 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-02-22 11:04 ` jean-marc alliot
2000-02-22 17:05 ` Pascal Cuoq
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000222104602Q.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox