From: Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
To: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: camlp4 3.10: Tuple processing
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:34:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1F2DC9D5-570E-45AF-B355-0B55ACB12C56@gmail.com> (raw)
Looking at Martin's json code I find this example of tuple conversion
in the old syntax:
| Tuple l ->
let tl = List.map convert l in
<:ctyp< ( $list:tl$ ) >>
In the new syntax the same code becomes something much larger:
| Tuple l ->
(* (* Development version post-3.10.0+beta: *)
let tl = List.map convert l in
<:ctyp< ( $tup:Ast.tySta_of_list tl$ ) >> *)
let t =
List.fold_right
(fun x tup -> <:ctyp< $convert x$ * $tup$ >>)
l <:ctyp< >> in
<:ctyp< $tup:t$ >>
What is the advantage of the new approach and how did it become so
verbose?
Thanks, Joel
[1] http://martin.jambon.free.fr/examples/pa_json_static_3100beta.html
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-30 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-30 14:34 Joel Reymont [this message]
2007-04-30 14:40 ` Joel Reymont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1F2DC9D5-570E-45AF-B355-0B55ACB12C56@gmail.com \
--to=joelr1@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox