* [Caml-list] NaN reresentations @ 2015-09-02 17:56 Andreas Rossberg 2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli 2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andreas Rossberg @ 2015-09-02 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ocaml Mailing List Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed? We are currently in the process of implementing a reference interpreter for a little low-level language, and that tries to be as accurate as possible about float representations. Thanks, /Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] NaN reresentations 2015-09-02 17:56 [Caml-list] NaN reresentations Andreas Rossberg @ 2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli 2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Daniel Bünzli @ 2015-09-02 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Rossberg; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List Le mercredi, 2 septembre 2015 à 18:56, Andreas Rossberg a écrit : > Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed? I don't remember exactly but I think there may be issues with marshaling. A quick search with in the bt leads to: http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5038 But there may be other to look at. Best, Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] NaN reresentations 2015-09-02 17:56 [Caml-list] NaN reresentations Andreas Rossberg 2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli @ 2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy 2015-09-02 20:56 ` Andreas Rossberg 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Xavier Leroy @ 2015-09-02 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Rossberg; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --] 2015-09-02 10:56 GMT-07:00 Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>: > Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable > representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to > create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit > pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed? > It depends on the underlying hardware. For instance, with x86-32 bits, some FP moves go through the x87 FP stack, undergoing a double -> extended -> double conversion. These conversions turn signaling NaNs into quiet NaNs, and I'm not sure they preserve the other bits of the NaN payload. On other platforms, esp. x86-64 bits, I'm pretty confident that NaN bits are preserved by copying and parameter passing. > > We are currently in the process of implementing a reference interpreter > for a little low-level language, and that tries to be as accurate as > possible about float representations. > One possibility would be to represent your floats as int64 values (= their bit-level representation), and convert only when you operate over them, e.g. let fp_add x y = Int64.bits_of_float (Int64.float_of_bits x +. Int64.float_of_bits y) Best, - Xavier [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1771 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] NaN reresentations 2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy @ 2015-09-02 20:56 ` Andreas Rossberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andreas Rossberg @ 2015-09-02 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Xavier Leroy; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List On Sep 2, 2015, at 21:14 , Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote: > 2015-09-02 10:56 GMT-07:00 Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>: > > Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed? > > It depends on the underlying hardware. For instance, with x86-32 bits, some FP moves go through the x87 FP stack, undergoing a double -> extended -> double conversion. These conversions turn signaling NaNs into quiet NaNs, and I'm not sure they preserve the other bits of the NaN payload. > > On other platforms, esp. x86-64 bits, I'm pretty confident that NaN bits are preserved by copying and parameter passing. I see. Okay, in that case it seems safer not to rely on it, for the sake of portability. > > We are currently in the process of implementing a reference interpreter for a little low-level language, and that tries to be as accurate as possible about float representations. > > One possibility would be to represent your floats as int64 values (= their bit-level representation), and convert only when you operate over them, e.g. > > let fp_add x y = Int64.bits_of_float (Int64.float_of_bits x +. Int64.float_of_bits y) Right, that is the approach we are currently discussing. but I was wondering whether it is necessary. Thanks! /Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-02 20:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-09-02 17:56 [Caml-list] NaN reresentations Andreas Rossberg 2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli 2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy 2015-09-02 20:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox