From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA23322 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:34:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA30501 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:53:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: from diana.zesoi.fer.hr (diana.zesoi.fer.hr [161.53.64.5])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA02926
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:52:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from damirb@localhost)
	by diana.zesoi.fer.hr (8.9.3/8.9.0) id WAA27920
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:50:45 +0100 (MET)
From: Damir BIJUKLIC <damirb@zesoi.fer.hr>
Message-Id: <199903102150.WAA27920@diana.zesoi.fer.hr>
Subject: OCAML inheritance question
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:50:45 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL50s (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: weis

When i have inheritance hierarchy shaped like a diamond:

           a
          / \
         b   c
          \ /
           d

class d inherits two copies of a's instance variables. If I want to have
only
one copy it seems I need to linearize inheritance hieararchy what I'm 
reluctant to do.

So is there any way I could have d with one copy of a's instance variables?

Damir