From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA13114 for caml-redistribution; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:20:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA21780 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:11:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA08373; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:11:06 +0100 (MET) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA27078; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:11:06 +0100 (MET) From: Pierre Weis Message-Id: <199903100911.KAA27078@pauillac.inria.fr> Subject: Re: CamlIDL - stub code generator and COM binding for OCaml To: Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr (Xavier Leroy) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:11:06 +0100 (MET) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <19990309170720.03713@pauillac.inria.fr> from "Xavier Leroy" at Mar 9, 99 05:07:20 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis Why not having a way to explicitely designate the label of the type ? For instance foo`lab would designate the label lab of the type foo. This is not ambiguous and furthermore it solves the problem of another useful extension, namely anonymous record arguments of constructors: C`lab would also designate the label lab of the argument of constructor C. All the best, Pierre Weis INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://cristal.inria.fr/~weis/