Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Vouillon <Jerome.Vouillon@inria.fr>
To: Markus Mottl <mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>, OCAML <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: subtyping and inheritance
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:02:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990115160242.08046@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199901111852.TAA00822@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>; from Markus Mottl on Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 07:52:57PM +0100

Hello,

> My specific problem is: I have a program with classes for "terminal"
> and "nonterminal" symbols. Both inherit from a base class "symbol". The
> symbol class inherits from a class "ord", which defines a virtual method
> "compare". This allows me to compare terminals with terminals and
> nonterminals with nonterminals, but it also allows comparison between
> symbols (all three classes redefine "compare").
> 
> Look at this graph:
> 
>          ord                ->  defines virtual method "compare"
>           |
>         symbol              ->  redefines "compare"
>        /      \
>    terminal  nonterminal    ->  both redefine "compare"
> 
> But the problem is: I will never be able to compare terminals and
> nonterminals with each other, because the appropriate comparison method
> as defined in "symbol" has been "forgotten" - it is redefined in all
> child classes. Thus, I am not able to coerce them to "symbol".
> 
> I have worked around this with the following inheritance scheme:
> 
>     ---- ord -----          ->  defines virtual method "compare"
>     |            |
>     |   symbol   |          ->  has a method "compare_symbol"
>     |  /      \  |
>    terminal  nonterminal    ->  both redefine "compare"
> 
> Although it is now possible to coerce terminals and nonterminals
> to symbols and have them thus compared via "compare_symbol", I am not
> content with this scheme: I would really like to have all methods from
> "ord" in "symbol", which all make use of the virtual "compare" method.

I think the method "compare" in class "ord" need not be a binary method: its
argument type can probably instead be a type parameter of the class.
    class virtual ['a] ord = object
      method virtual compare : 'a -> bool
      (* ... *)
    end;;
Then, the method "compare" can be given the type "symbol -> bool" in
class "symbol" (and its subclasses) :
    class symbol = object (self)
      inherit [symbol] ord
      method x = "x"
      method compare other = self#x = other#x
    end;;
    class terminal = object
      inherit symbol
      method x = "a"
      method y = "y"
    end;;
This way, you can compare objects from the class "symbol" and any of
its subclasses.
    # new terminal#compare new symbol;; 
    - : bool = false
    # new terminal#compare (new terminal :> symbol);;
    - : bool = true

Regards,

-- Jerome




  reply	other threads:[~1999-01-15 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-01-11 18:52 Markus Mottl
1999-01-15 15:02 ` Jerome Vouillon [this message]
1999-01-15 17:37   ` Markus Mottl
1999-01-18 19:55     ` Jerome Vouillon
1999-01-18 21:18       ` Markus Mottl
1999-01-20 11:50         ` Hendrik Tews
1999-01-25  0:08           ` Markus Mottl
1999-01-25 15:06             ` Musings on Obj.magic (Was: subtyping and inheritance) David Monniaux
1999-01-27 14:18             ` subtyping and inheritance Jerome Vouillon
1999-01-27 14:45               ` Markus Mottl
1999-01-28 19:40               ` Hendrik Tews
1999-01-27 14:28           ` Jerome Vouillon
1999-04-15 12:18 Giuseppe Castagna
1999-04-15 16:02 ` Markus Mottl
1999-04-20 12:38 ` Didier Remy
1999-04-20 15:06   ` Giuseppe Castagna
1999-04-21 12:18     ` Didier Remy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19990115160242.08046@pauillac.inria.fr \
    --to=jerome.vouillon@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox