From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA21561 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 13 May 1997 10:06:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA11616 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Mon, 12 May 1997 21:31:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from vegemite.Stanford.EDU (vegemite.Stanford.EDU [171.65.76.158]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA21036 for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 12 May 1997 21:30:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (arc@localhost) by vegemite.Stanford.EDU (8.7.1/8.6.4) id MAA29515; Mon, 12 May 1997 12:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 12:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andrew Conway <arc@sequence.Stanford.EDU>
Message-Id: <199705121928.MAA29515@vegemite.Stanford.EDU>
To: clasohm@rivalnet.com, laheadle@midway.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: ocaml needs users: native code for windows?
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Sender: weis

> You still can't ship a plain binary, can you?  Do you rely on your
> users installing ocaml, or do you package up the distribution and send
> it with your product?

I can't see any problem shipping a plain binary. Indeed I have successfully
offered precompiled versions of some ocaml programs under various
flavours of Unix. (These are ocamlopt compiled things, but I presume
one can do the same with the -custom option to ocamlc).

Regards,

Andrew.

[ On peut envoyer un fichier seul pour un logiciel : On n'a pa besoin
  de tout de ocaml quand on veut donner quelqu'un un logiciel ocaml ]