From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA06201 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 16:12:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA21374 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:08:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from gemsgw.med.ge.com ([192.88.230.10]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA14498 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:08:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from gemed.med.ge.com (gemed.med.ge.com [3.7.12.4]) by gemsgw.med.ge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA18694; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 14:05:43 -0600 Received: from nmri.med.ge.com (snap.med.ge.com [3.57.196.10]) by gemed.med.ge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA08025; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 14:07:34 -0600 Received: from swag.med.ge.com by nmri.med.ge.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06252; Wed, 5 Feb 97 12:12:26 PST Received: by swag.med.ge.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id MAA06485; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 12:07:05 -0800 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 12:07:05 -0800 From: gurr@snap.med.ge.com (David Gurr) Message-Id: <199702052007.MAA06485@swag.med.ge.com> To: fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de Subject: Re: (O)caml and Java Cc: caml-list@inria.fr X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Sender: weis > From Pierre.Weis@inria.fr Wed Jan 29 10:30:17 1997 > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:05:28 +0100 > From: Fritz Heinrichmeyer > To: christo@nextsolution.co.jp > Cc: caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: Re: (O)caml and Java > Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94) > > Some month ago i compared some simple programs: > > ocaml bytecompiled seems to be remarkable faster than byte compiled > java. > > MMM-applets are remarkable faster than JAVA awt-applets. > Since there are numerous Java implementations and some of the most common are the slowest, it would help if you said what implementations you were compareing and what C compiler you used as well. -D