From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA12404 for caml-redistribution; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 19:17:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA08589 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:08:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: from jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de (jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de [132.176.7.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA25471 for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:07:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from jfh@localhost)
          by jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de (8.8.4/8.8.4)
   id QAA22238; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:05:28 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:05:28 +0100
Message-Id: <199701291505.QAA22238@jfh00.fernuni-hagen.de>
From: Fritz Heinrichmeyer <fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de>
To: christo@nextsolution.co.jp
CC: caml-list@inria.fr
In-reply-to: <199701290558.OAA00388@sparc3.co.jp> (message from Frank
	Christoph on Wed, 29 Jan 1997 14:58:41 +0900)
Subject: Re: (O)caml and Java
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: weis

Some month ago i compared some simple programs:

ocaml bytecompiled seems to be remarkable faster than byte compiled
java.

MMM-applets are remarkable faster than JAVA awt-applets.