From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA11484 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 13:56:27 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA02234 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:01:04 +0100 Received: from tide03.microsoft.com (firewall-user@tide03.microsoft.com [131.107.3.13]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id AAA28050 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 00:01:01 +0100 (MET) Received: by tide03.microsoft.com; id PAA18285; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:06:25 -0800 Received: from unknown(157.54.17.73) by tide03.microsoft.com via smap (g3.0.3) id xma018252; Wed, 20 Dec 95 15:05:59 -0800 Received: from xnet2 (xnet2.microsoft.com [157.54.17.205]) by imail1.microsoft.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id PAA02985 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:03:10 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199512202303.PAA02985@imail1.microsoft.com> X-Received: from red-29-msg by xnet2 with receive; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 15:00:15 -0800 X-MSMail-Message-ID: A68F7483 X-MSMail-Conversation-ID: A68F7483 From: Kevin Gallo To: pierre.weis@inria.fr Date: Wed, 20 Dec 95 14:58:39 TZ Subject: RE: a few questions for the CAML community X-MsXMTID: red-29-msg951220225904MTP[01.51.00]000000a1-55056 Sender: weis Message-ID: red-29-msg951220225904MTP[01.51.00]000000a1-55056 I have already ported CSL to Windows NT (almost works under Win95 as well). It requires VC++ and MASM but most of the issues are already resolved. I will be giving my changes back to Xavier for integration into the mainline distribution. ---------- | From: Robbert VanRenesse | To: | Subject: a few questions for the CAML community | Date: Monday, December 18, 1995 4:57PM | | X-Received: from xnet2 by red-29-msg with receive; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 04:39:43 -0800 | X-Received: from imail2.microsoft.com by xnet2 with recvsmtp; | Tue, 19 Dec 1995 04:39:41 -0800 | Received: from tide10.microsoft.com (red-10-int.microsoft.com | [157.61.218.20]) by imail2.microsoft.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with | SMTP id EAA22276 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 | 04:42:14 -0800 (PST) | Received: by tide10.microsoft.com; id EAA21291; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 04:49:08 -0800 | Received: from concorde.inria.fr(192.93.2.39) by tide10.microsoft.com via smap (g3.0.3) | id xma021218; Tue, 19 Dec 95 04:48:19 -0800 | Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr | [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP | id NAA08645; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:35:20 +0100 (MET) | Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr | (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA00775 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 19 | Dec 1995 13:19:06 +0100 | Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr | [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP | id WAA21904 for ; Mon, 18 Dec | 1995 22:57:53 +0100 | Received: from margaux.inria.fr (margaux.inria.fr | [128.93.8.2]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id | WAA00461 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 | 22:57:52 +0100 (MET) | Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr | [192.93.2.39]) by margaux.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP | id WAA10743 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 | 22:57:52 +0100 | Received: from simon.cs.cornell.edu (SIMON.CS.CORNELL.EDU | [128.84.154.10]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP | id WAA00457 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 | 22:57:51 +0100 (MET) | Received: from cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (CLOYD.CS.CORNELL.EDU | [128.84.227.15]) by simon.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/R1.4) with | ESMTP id QAA21148 for ; Mon, 18 | Dec 1995 16:57:44 -0500 | Received: from snotra.cs.cornell.edu (SNOTRA.CS.CORNELL.EDU | [128.84.218.5]) by cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/M1.8) with | ESMTP id QAA14579 for ; Mon, 18 | Dec 1995 16:57:42 -0500 | Received: (rvr@localhost) by snotra.cs.cornell.edu | (8.6.10/C1.3) id QAA00541 for caml-list@margaux.inria.fr; Mon, | 18 Dec 1995 16:57:40 -0500 | Message-Id: <199512182157.QAA00541@snotra.cs.cornell.edu> | Sender: Pierre.Weis@inria.fr | X-MsXMTID: xnet2951219123941RECVSMTP[01.51.00]00000086-3847 | | | | 1) would it be really hard to port CSL to Windows NT? I can't imagine, but | any hints to what problems one could expect would be very helpful. | 2) would it be really hard to have an application that incorporated both | SmallTalk and CSL code? I would think so, because there would be two | garbage collectors in the same memory. If I'm right about this, I | would just put the two parts in separate processes talking though some | form of IPC. Again, any input would be appreciated. | | Robbert |