From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA00775 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 19 Dec 1995 13:19:06 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA21904 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 22:57:53 +0100 Received: from margaux.inria.fr (margaux.inria.fr [128.93.8.2]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id WAA00461 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 22:57:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by margaux.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA10743 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 22:57:52 +0100 Received: from simon.cs.cornell.edu (SIMON.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.154.10]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id WAA00457 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 22:57:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (CLOYD.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.227.15]) by simon.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/R1.4) with ESMTP id QAA21148 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:57:44 -0500 Received: from snotra.cs.cornell.edu (SNOTRA.CS.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.218.5]) by cloyd.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/M1.8) with ESMTP id QAA14579 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:57:42 -0500 From: Robbert VanRenesse Received: (rvr@localhost) by snotra.cs.cornell.edu (8.6.10/C1.3) id QAA00541 for caml-list@margaux.inria.fr; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:57:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 16:57:40 -0500 Message-Id: <199512182157.QAA00541@snotra.cs.cornell.edu> To: caml-list@margaux.inria.fr Subject: a few questions for the CAML community Sender: weis 1) would it be really hard to port CSL to Windows NT? I can't imagine, but any hints to what problems one could expect would be very helpful. 2) would it be really hard to have an application that incorporated both SmallTalk and CSL code? I would think so, because there would be two garbage collectors in the same memory. If I'm right about this, I would just put the two parts in separate processes talking though some form of IPC. Again, any input would be appreciated. Robbert