From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF0F7FAD2
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:25:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=212.227.126.187;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com";
  x-sender="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=212.227.126.187;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com";
  x-sender="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mout.kundenserver.de) identity=helo;
  client-ip=212.227.126.187;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mout.kundenserver.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am4BAPoLSlTU4367nGdsb2JhbABcg2JZzRaHTQKBDBYBEQEBAQEBBg0JCRQuhAMBAQSBCQshJQ8BRwYBiFIFCck5AQEIAQEBAQEdijuFajqESwWLJTyHK4M/iEM8hXpAkgyDKAEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: Am4BAPoLSlTU4367nGdsb2JhbABcg2JZzRaHTQKBDBYBEQEBAQEBBg0JCRQuhAMBAQSBCQshJQ8BRwYBiFIFCck5AQEIAQEBAQEdijuFajqESwWLJTyHK4M/iEM8hXpAkgyDKAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,779,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="102699593"
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Oct 2014 10:25:03 +0200
Received: from agaric.localnet (ntkngw201140.kngw.nt.ngn.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [121.93.165.140])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreue005) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0M6ym1-1Y5Avx2con-00wkaH; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:25:02 +0200
From: Louis Gesbert <louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr, Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:24:55 +0900
Message-ID: <1919725.JXBnejpNnf@agaric>
Organization: OCamlPro
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-2-amd64; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <40127c451511cbd61121e98fb9bca1f3@dogguy.org>
References: <1973088.rneftt9XYK@agaric> <40127c451511cbd61121e98fb9bca1f3@dogguy.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:xjFMpp+aOW6N6NJcX7TuwgSZvusuT0At09uvm79V/X0
 b2AvriSyDfpW2AO70qSv2qMtUkUd4go8ZPqfasDtWONLcB0nRp
 T7ED/ClfaUs8Qps6DJ3kxw5+/nWj4PlnGZfJ46s+PZpRezMdDJ
 p5ZgNgNsvx2W0zf/cwqVg/mraYcG3pV1NjFgNo2XlT8KZtpm/G
 ErsvRArreGrqtyMPv55OboCxlcTne1aXtfORQcQPikX/FdCyNE
 9MF5dbfzik5d+d8DYuK6fTu+5k8HTHWw0eOZScfw9npvuY4KZp
 4Njwrr/YF+CMupgLbkSMymE4h2uI57sJ4f5z97jos0SYma5bwK
 k2vvlX2na2fXB/4dXPek=
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
X-Validation-by: louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] OPAM 1.2.0

Indeed, 1.2.0-rc4 has been promoted to 1.2.0 ; the sources are identical, a=
nd no upgrade is required if you were already on RC4.

Release is shown on https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases, but latest, lat=
est-test, rc4 and 1.2.0 being on the same commit, github orders them in its=
 own way (and displays the date of the commit as date of the release, which=
 is kind of wrong).

Sorry for the confusion. And thanks a lot for the packaging efforts !

Le vendredi 24 octobre 2014, 10:06:13 Mehdi Dogguy a =E9crit :
> Le 2014-10-24 07:55, Louis Gesbert a =E9crit :
> > We're very proud to announce the final release of OPAM 1.2.0
> >=20
> > This is a big step after 1.1, with lots of new features and a huge
> > effort put into improving the ease of use, output and error handling.
> > Read the full announcement at
> >=20
> >     http://opam.ocaml.org/blog/opam-1-2-0-release
> >=20
>=20
> On https://github.com/ocaml/opam/tags, I see that rc4 and the final
> release are made from the same commit. Is that correct? IOW, for those
> whose use rc4, do they have to upgrade to the final release? The=20
> release
> is also not mentioned on https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases. So
> maybe I picked up the wrong tarball.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
>=20