From: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <filliatr@lri.fr>
To: EEK Cooper <s0567141@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Map.fold behavior changed
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:43:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17406.61821.450737.625981@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060224112209.51szurk2dc00oggg@www.sms.ed.ac.uk>
EEK Cooper writes:
>
> My team just noticed that the behavior of Map.fold changed in OCaml
> version 3.08.4.
>
> I'm concerned that the OCaml team would change the behavior of a
> library function so late in its life. I understand that it was thought
> to be "wrong" <http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3607>, but
> changing the behavior of an existing function breaks existing apps and
> shouldn't be done lightly.
I must agree with you since we also got a similar bug in one of our
apps due to this Map.fold _implementation_ change.
However, we must also admit that we were using an unspecified feature
of the standard library. If I remember correctly, the documentation
was saying that the traversal order was left _unspecified_. The new
version of Map.fold simply has a stronger, but consistent,
specification. From this point of view, the Ocaml team thus cannot be
blamed.
You (and I) were using the _implementation_ as a specification, which
is bad :-)
--
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre (http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-24 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-24 11:22 EEK Cooper
2006-02-24 11:43 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre [this message]
2006-02-24 13:29 ` [Caml-list] " EEK Cooper
2006-02-24 13:44 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-02-24 14:13 ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-24 15:43 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-24 16:20 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-02-24 16:01 ` Joaquin Cuenca Abela
2006-02-27 12:59 ` Damien Doligez
2006-03-02 13:57 ` Ezra Cooper
2006-03-03 15:41 ` N. Owen Gunden
2006-03-09 7:14 ` Florian Hars
2006-03-13 16:31 ` Damien Doligez
2006-03-15 7:27 ` Florian Hars
2006-03-15 7:37 ` Jon Harrop
2006-03-15 7:40 ` Alain Frisch
2006-03-15 8:41 ` Florian Hars
2006-03-15 21:18 ` Christophe Raffalli
2006-02-24 15:31 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-01 5:20 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-03-01 9:33 ` Nicolas Pouillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17406.61821.450737.625981@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=filliatr@lri.fr \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=s0567141@sms.ed.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox