From: Olivier Andrieu <oandrieu@nerim.net>
To: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] On Store_field()
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:05:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17374.7466.676326.847871@karryall.dnsalias.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601301358220.6172@eiger.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Thomas Fischbacher [Monday 30 January 2006] :
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Damien Doligez wrote:
>
> > >However I strongly recommend instead
> > >
> > > StoreField(v,n,(value)(void*)p);
> >
> > This is the only way. Always use Store_field, Store_double_field,
> > and Store_double_val.
>
> What you *actually* forgot to tell people is that OCaml
> unfortunately lacks a macro with which one can store C pointers to
> alloc_final allocated blocks. If one writes to those using e.g.
>
> ml_vector = alloc_final(2, finalize_vector, 1, 10);
> Store_field(ml_vector, 1,(value)vector);
>
> with vector being a C pointer to a structure, this may or may not
> lead to random crashes at very unexpected places - because (as I
> think now) the Store_field macro will be over-eager trying to tell
> the GC about the value stored - which it should just ignore in this
> particular case!
>
> Indeed, this has been discussed before, I think:
>
> http://groups.google.de/group/fa.caml/msg/60ace9405fcf60c0?dmode=source&hl=de
>
> So, I would strongly suggest introducing a macro that behaves like this:
>
> #define Store_c_field(block,offset,x) (Field(block,offset)=(value)x)
>
> so that one could then use
>
> Store_c_field(ml_vector, 1,vector);
>
> I actually just spent a full week tracking down precisely this
> issue in a not particularly trivial C library interface I am
> building right now. After looking in the weirdest places, ensuring
> it's not an issue with the library wrapped, or the trickier pieces
> of my own code, I even started patching debugging code into the
> OCaml bytecode's GC and rebuilding...
>
> So, *please* do the world a great favour and tell people about that
> issue in the C interface documentation!
Well, it already does:
,----
| Rule 3 Assignments to the fields of structured blocks must be done
| with the Store_field macro (for normal blocks) or Store_double_field
| macro (for arrays and records of floating-point numbers). Other
| assignments must not use Store_field nor Store_double_field.
`----
Final (aka custom) blocks are not structured blocks but raw blocks
(not traced by the GC), so assignements to those blocks falls in the
"other assignments" category.
A good way to deal with custom blocks in the C code is to create a
small struct type and access the content of the block through this type.
struct custom_foo_bar {
foo *pointer1;
bar *pointer3;
};
value alloc_foo_bar (foo *f, bar *b)
{
value v;
struct custom_foo_bar *s;
v = alloc_custom (&foo_bar_ops, sizeof struct custom_foo_bar, 1, 10);
s = Data_custom_val (v);
s->p1 = f;
s->p2 = b;
return v;
}
--
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-30 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-18 18:28 C interface style question Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-18 19:18 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2006-01-18 20:32 ` Florent Monnier
2006-01-18 21:31 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-01-18 23:21 ` Florent Monnier
2006-01-18 23:43 ` Robert Roessler
2006-01-19 0:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-01-19 3:17 ` skaller
2006-01-19 14:09 ` Damien Doligez
2006-01-19 14:17 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-19 14:24 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-19 14:52 ` Olivier Andrieu
2006-01-20 10:49 ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-12 20:40 ` Olivier Andrieu
2006-02-13 9:45 ` Damien Doligez
2006-01-19 15:15 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-30 13:12 ` On Store_field() Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-30 14:05 ` Olivier Andrieu [this message]
2006-01-19 12:13 ` [Caml-list] C interface style question Thomas Fischbacher
2006-01-19 13:49 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17374.7466.676326.847871@karryall.dnsalias.org \
--to=oandrieu@nerim.net \
--cc=Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox