* Again C-Interface: caml_alloc_custom
@ 2006-01-20 15:07 Bauer, Christoph
2006-01-20 15:27 ` [Caml-list] " Olivier Andrieu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bauer, Christoph @ 2006-01-20 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Hi,
many thanks for the anwsers of my other questions.
I use Custom_blocks in OCaml to handle reference-countend
objects (Tcl_Obj). My program runs fine - but only with use=0, max=1
in caml_alloc_custom.
caml_alloc_custom( &tcl_obj_ops, sizeof( Tcl_Obj * ), 0, 1 );
Otherwise (use=1, max=1; use=1, max=100) I get random
crashes (e.g. in mark_slice). This makes me a bad feeling.
Maybe something more is involved (Callbacks+GC?), because with a simple
test (many allocations and finalizations) case couldn't reproduce
this crash.
Does anybody have such experiences?
Could be here a problem (CAMLparam+CAMLreturn in C-called function):
static value copy_tcl_array(int objc, Tcl_Obj * const * objv)
{
CAMLparam0 ();
CAMLlocal2 (result, t);
int n;
result = Val_int(0);
for (n = objc-1; n >= 0; --n) {
t = caml_alloc_small(2,0);
Field(t, 0) = alloc_tcl_obj( objv[n] );
Field(t, 1) = result;
result = t;
}
CAMLreturn (result);
}
... C-Code:
r = callback(*f, copy_tcl_array(objc-2, objv+2));
Regards,
Christoph Bauer
For completness the tcl_obj_ops:
#define TclObj_val(x) (*((Tcl_Obj**) Data_custom_val(x)))
static
void finalize_tclobj( value v ) {
/* printf("finalize tclobj\n"); */
fflush(stdout);
Tcl_DecrRefCount( TclObj_val (v) );
}
static
int compare_tclobj( value v1, value v2 ) {
CAMLparam2( v1, v2 );
CAMLreturn( strcmp( Tcl_GetString( TclObj_val(v1)),
Tcl_GetString( TclObj_val(v2) )));
}
static
long hash_tclobj( value v ) {
CAMLparam1( v );
char *s = Tcl_GetString( TclObj_val(v ) );
long result = 0;
while( *s ) result = (result * 7) + *s++;
CAMLreturn( result );
}
static
struct custom_operations tcl_obj_ops = {
"Tcl_Obj",
&finalize_tclobj,
&compare_tclobj,
&hash_tclobj,
custom_serialize_default,
custom_deserialize_default
};
Christoph Bauer
Dipl. Inf.
LMS Deutschland GmbH
Luxemburgerstr. 7
D-67657 Kaiserslautern
T +49 631 303 22 152
mailto:Christoph.Bauer@lms-gmbh.de
http://www.lmsintl.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Again C-Interface: caml_alloc_custom
2006-01-20 15:07 Again C-Interface: caml_alloc_custom Bauer, Christoph
@ 2006-01-20 15:27 ` Olivier Andrieu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Andrieu @ 2006-01-20 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bauer, Christoph; +Cc: caml-list
Bauer, Christoph [Friday 20 January 2006] :
> Could be here a problem (CAMLparam+CAMLreturn in C-called function):
>
> static value copy_tcl_array(int objc, Tcl_Obj * const * objv)
> {
> CAMLparam0 ();
> CAMLlocal2 (result, t);
> int n;
>
> result = Val_int(0);
> for (n = objc-1; n >= 0; --n) {
> t = caml_alloc_small(2,0);
> Field(t, 0) = alloc_tcl_obj( objv[n] );
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I guess alloc_tcl_obj creates the custom block. That's wrong because
the block t you've just allocated with caml_alloc_small is not
completely initialized yet.
Either do this (safe, higher-level way):
,----
| t = caml_alloc (2, 0);
| Store_field (t, 0, alloc_tcl_obj (objv[n]));
| Store_field (t, 1, result);
`----
or that (lower-level) :
,----
| CAMLlocal1(obj);
| obj = alloc_tcl_obj (objv[n]);
| t = caml_alloc_small (2, 0);
| Field (t, 0) = obj;
| Field (t, 1) = result;
`----
--
Olivier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-20 15:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-20 15:07 Again C-Interface: caml_alloc_custom Bauer, Christoph
2006-01-20 15:27 ` [Caml-list] " Olivier Andrieu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox