From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA07502 for caml-red; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:05:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA31627 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:55:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from post.webmailer.de (natmail2.webmailer.de [192.67.198.65]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f15ItJ911277 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:55:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from t2 (pD950775F.dip.t-dialin.net [217.80.119.95]) by post.webmailer.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA14959; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:55:15 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 19:58:44 +0100 From: Stephan Tolksdorf X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <16911685873.20010205195844@gmx.de> To: Brian Rogoff CC: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Unbound type constructor In-reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr > If you check the recent Caml list archives under the title "circular > types" (I think!) you'll find lots of discussion of the parameterization > trick and other approaches. I've just found the thread in the archives. I've searched for it before but I obviously had difficulties to find the right keywords. Maybe this topic should be added to the faq? Stephan Tolksdorf PS: Is it me or is the time a mail needs to get finally delivered when it is posted via the list rather slow?