From: Fabrice Le Fessant <fabrice@lefessant.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: User library license
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:46:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15964.50497.738525.191133@lachesis.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0b2c03466d9bb84ea89b1df98760729@cypherpunks.to>
> To: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
> <nobody@cypherpunks.to>
I think it is the first time I've seen a post completely
anonymous in this list :) What are you afraid of ?
> Then everybody loses. Me, the business, and XYZ Project.
> Believe me, I've had the GPL/BSD debate before, and am not
> interested in repeating it.
So, why do you restart it ?
> My statement is simply that the GPL philosophy completely misreads
> the business situation. It sets up an artificial antagonism
> instead of finding common ground.
I agree with you. GPL code has a goal which does not always meet the
needs of business companies. And so what ? Why should somebody provide
free code to your company, and receive nothing from you ? GPL is just
an exchange: I give you my code, but you have to give your code to me
too. Nothing prevents a company from rewritting everything to get rid
of the licences (and that's what they do). That's also the reason why
you are paid for coding, and not most GPL code writters.
I love using GPL code at home, when I need to write a small useful
tool. At work, I cannot use it, I rewrite what I need. But I'm paid
for it. And if my company does not want to waste money for me to
rewrite existing code, they can simply release the code as GPL. That's
the way it works.
> There are Bad Guys like Microsoft, but also Good Guys like
> Sun and IBM, which have both given away millions of lines of
> code.
You know good guys at Sun and IBM ?
> OK, thanks everyone, I know opinions differ, this is just
> my perspective and I hope it was communicated clearly.
That's just my opinion too, and in no way should be understood as the
official opinion of my company.
- Fabrice
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-26 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-26 3:30 Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
2003-02-26 13:46 ` Fabrice Le Fessant [this message]
2003-02-26 14:19 ` Sven Luther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15964.50497.738525.191133@lachesis.inria.fr \
--to=fabrice@lefessant.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox