Re: [Caml-list] recursive modules redux, & interface files

[Fabrice Le Fessant <fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr>]

Why don't you use classes ? You can define classes with "virtual"
methods for the functions you will not define immediatly, and then
define them in another module. Later, you can create a class which
inherit from both classes, thus binding correctly all variables.

Isn't "late binding" the only interest of objects ? :) 

Of course, this only works for functions. For types, you should use
a separate module. Some time ago, I wrote a patch to ocaml to allow
C-like linking under some conditions. I can update it to 3.01 if you
are interested.

- Fabrice

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr