From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA22232 for caml-red; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:20:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA22576 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:50:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from cs.clemson.edu (citron.cs.clemson.edu [130.127.48.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e5NCo2X27814 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:50:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from merlin.cs.clemson.edu (merlin [130.127.48.80]) by cs.clemson.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA16380 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:49:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from steve@localhost) by merlin.cs.clemson.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA24990; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:49:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Stevenson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:49:55 -0400 (EDT) To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Multiple Yacc-style Parsers in one application? X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14675.23674.237350.612515@merlin.cs.clemson.edu> Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Good morning. I'm interested in hearing experiences from people who have used multiple yacc parsers in one application. I assume that they would share one lexer buffer (but maybe not). Do you have to manipulate the lexical world to deal with the one-lookahead? Any experiences, stories, etc, greatly appreciated. Best regards, steve ----- Steve (really "D. E.") Stevenson Assoc Prof Department of Computer Science, Clemson, (864)656-5880.mabell Support V&V mailing list: ivandv@cs.clemson.edu