From: Leo White <leo@lpw25.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Odd type error reporting
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 04:52:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465980742.269779.638209889.162FFE6E@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f43edd10-1400-f846-35d4-ab2c09f029d8@tu-berlin.de>
This bug was fixed in 4.03.0:
Characters 29-32:
let () = { f = fun bar -> { bar } };;
^^^
Error: This record expression is expected to have type foo
The field bar does not belong to type foo
I vaguely remember a mantis about this (or a similar issue) and that
it was resolved, but I don't have its PR number to hand.
Regards,
Leo
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, at 03:37 AM, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It just took me 30min to figure out a rather simple type-error in my
> code. It was complicated by ocamlc's strange error reporting. Consider
> this example:
>
> % cat error.ml
> type foo = { foo : int }
> type bar = { bar : int }
> type baz = { f : int -> foo }
>
> let () = { f = fun bar -> { bar } }
> % ocamlc error.ml
> File "error.ml", line 5, characters 28-31:
> Error: This record expression is expected to have type baz
> The field bar does not belong to type foo
>
>
>
> ocamlc correctly spots the "bar" in the last line as the source of the
> error. However, it says, it is expected to have type "baz", but that is
> the surrounding constructor.
>
> In fact, the "correct" error is:
>
> File "error.ml", line 5, characters 26-33:
> Error: This record expression is expected to have type foo
> The field bar does not belong to type foo
>
>
>
> Obviously, in a perfect world, the wrongly labeled field should be
> pointed out as well (kind of a sub-error). However, it seems problematic
> that the outermost record-mismatch is reported.
>
> Is this a known bug/feature? Does it change in later versions (I am on
> 4.02.3 now)?
>
> thanks,
>
> Christoph
> --
> Christoph Höger
>
> Technische Universität Berlin
> Fakultät IV - Elektrotechnik und Informatik
> Übersetzerbau und Programmiersprachen
>
> Sekr. TEL12-2, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin
>
> Tel.: +49 (30) 314-24890
> E-Mail: christoph.hoeger@tu-berlin.de
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-15 7:37 Christoph Höger
2016-06-15 8:52 ` Leo White [this message]
2016-06-15 9:20 ` octachron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1465980742.269779.638209889.162FFE6E@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=leo@lpw25.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox