From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@topoi.pooq.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] reverse coercions
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:34:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465583657.32584.23.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160610181222.GA27973@topoi.pooq.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2168 bytes --]
Am Freitag, den 10.06.2016, 14:12 -0400 schrieb Hendrik Boom:
> In http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/u3-ocaml/ocaml-objects.html it says:
>
> reverse coercions from a supertype to a supertype are never possible in
> OCaml.
>
> (a) Might one of these 'supertype's actually be a 'subtype'?
The second should be a subtype.
> (b) Is there any way to do a run-time type-test on a value of a
> specific statically known supertype to test whether it is actually a
> value of a known specified subtype, and if so to proceed to use it as
> that subtype?
This is not possible (essentially because subtyping is not bound back to
the class hierarchy (a subclass is not necessarily a subtype), and there
is no runtime representation of the types).
To some extent you can emulate what you want with open variants, e.g.
(untested):
type leaftype = ..
class type supertype =
object
...
method leaftype : leaftype
end
class type subtype = ...
type leaftype +=
| Subtype of subtype
class subclass : subtype =
object(self)
inherit supertype
method leaftype = Leaftype self
...
end
For every subclass, define a new variant for leaftype. Then, the test is
let leafobj =
match obj#leaftype with
| Subtype x -> x
| _ -> failwith "coercion failed"
Gerd
> If so, I'd like to use this in a site of pattern-directed rule
> invocations.
>
> If not, I'd like to know if there are any well-known efficient ways
> around this. Of course I can effectively Godel-encode my data
> structures using lists, and interpret all my patterns and the
> application types I woyd have rather expressed as OCaml types, but I'm
> looking for something more elegant, statically checked, and
> efficient.
>
> -- hendrik
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
My OCaml site: http://www.camlcity.org
Contact details: http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage: http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-10 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 18:12 Hendrik Boom
2016-06-10 18:25 ` dario.teixeira
2016-06-10 19:05 ` [Caml-list] octothorpes and backticks? Hendrik Boom
2016-06-10 20:04 ` Anthony Tavener
2016-06-10 18:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann [this message]
[not found] ` <CAPFanBFa+MJzvt_KYmReuHSzRpD=fT=nEaXB4c7dMwWSL3w7Vg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-10 18:59 ` [Caml-list] reverse coercions Hendrik Boom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1465583657.32584.23.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de \
--to=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=hendrik@topoi.pooq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox