From: Thorsten Ohl <ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Preferred GUI Toolkit for O'Caml 3?
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:54:10 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14509.20226.13985.265187@heplix4.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> (raw)
I soon have to do major surgery (= an almost complete rewrite) on a
graphical user interface, currently in O'CamlTK.
Since retargeting to incompatible GUIs is such a boring job, I'd like
to hear which toolkit do you see in your tea leafs as the future
toolkit of choice?
- O'CamlTK [ (-) will be superseded by LablTK (I guess)
(-) inconvenient (no polymorphic variants) ]
- LablTK [ (+) more convenient than O'CamlTK
(+) part of O'Caml 2.99 ]
- mlgtk [ (+) Gtk+ is nicer than Tk (and no-Tcl is nicer than Tcl)
(-) is it ported to everything but the kitchen sink? ]
- lablgtk [ same a mlgtk, plus
(-) still beta
(+) appears(!) to have the slickest API ]
If you don't want to step on someone's toes, you can send me mail,
since I have no intention to start a flame war.
Merci,
-Thorsten
--
Thorsten Ohl, Physics Department, TU Darmstadt -- ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de
http://heplix.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de/~ohl/ [<=== PGP public key here]
next reply other threads:[~2000-02-21 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-18 13:54 Thorsten Ohl [this message]
2000-02-21 17:22 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2000-02-22 11:41 ` William Chesters
2000-02-23 7:36 ` Alan Schmitt
2000-02-23 9:24 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-02-24 10:24 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2000-02-25 16:22 ` skaller
2000-02-22 13:41 ` skaller
2000-02-22 14:22 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2000-02-22 1:46 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-02-22 13:39 ` skaller
2000-02-22 20:13 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2000-02-22 8:17 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-02-22 11:04 ` jean-marc alliot
2000-02-22 17:05 ` Pascal Cuoq
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14509.20226.13985.265187@heplix4.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de \
--to=ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox