From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: Christian Lindig <lindig@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Linking the num library with and without ocamlfind
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:37:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442961469.21446.6.camel@zotac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAB9A215-AEEA-42F0-92E6-9ADFF2CCFDC9@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1189 bytes --]
Am Dienstag, den 22.09.2015, 18:23 +0200 schrieb Christian Lindig:
> The “num" arbitrary precision library is part of the OCaml distribution and is linked as nums.cm(x)a. - note the trailing “s”. I noticed that the corresponding package for ocamlfind is called “num” - without the trailing “s”, and that the documentation also refers to the library as “num” but not “nums”. Is there a reason for this? I tripped over it when switching to/from ocamlfind.
In the source tree it is in otherlibs/num. The README file there calls
it libnum. It was me who called it num in findlib, but I do not remember
exactly why (years ago). Maybe I just picked one of the several names
without thinking too much about it.
Gerd
> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/libnum.html
>
> — Christian
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
My OCaml site: http://www.camlcity.org
Contact details: http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage: http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 16:23 Christian Lindig
2015-09-22 22:37 ` Gerd Stolpmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442961469.21446.6.camel@zotac \
--to=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=lindig@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox