* [Caml-list] Fwd: Re: [Q] How to use merlin with mikmatch_str ?
[not found] <1440683459994.1019c464@Nodemailer>
@ 2015-08-27 13:51 ` Runhang Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Runhang Li @ 2015-08-27 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]
Kindly,
Runhang
Begin forwarded message:
On Thursday, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Runhang Li <marklrh@gmail.com>, wrote:
Hi,
I am not maintainer of Merlin, but I think this issue may help: https://github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/issues/309
Thank you
Kindly,
Runhang
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/27/2015 02:55 PM, Runhang Li wrote:
> Hi, Matej
>
> See if this issue answers your question: https://github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/issues/358
>
> You can see all extensions that are being supported at src/kernel/extension.ml [1] .
>
> [1] : https://github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/blob/master/src/kernel/extension.ml#L49
Hi,
If I understand this correctly, then the support for a particular syntactic extension need to be hardwired into merlin?
Isn't that strange?
(compared to tools such as:
- ocamlc
- ocamlopt
- ocamldep
- ocamldoc
which need not to be sperately modified to support any new (valid) syntactic extension. Do they?
)
Why is merlin different in this respect?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2318 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread