From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3392E7F168 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:51:41 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:2Jdaux0HCp5XvI1PsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZsegRKvad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96LsLQa16GI7+jJYi8p39WoiDg6aptCVhsI2409vjcLJ4q7M3D9N+PgdCcgHc5PBxdP9nC/NlVJSo6lPwWB6kO74TNaIBjjLw09fr2zQd6JyZrrnL7us7ToICx2xxOFKYtoKxu3qQiD/uI3uqBFbpgL9x3Sv3FTcP5Xz247bXianhL7+9vitMU7q3cYk7sb+sVBSaT3ebgjBfwdVWx+cjN92Mq+/zLKSA/HwnoHTi9exhFBBgyA6BDhQr/wtDH7v6xzwn/JE9fxSOV+Yymk765tR1fMiW1PYzsw6mLTkMxYg6dSoRbnrBt6ld2HKLqJPeZzK/uONegRQnBMC4MID3RM Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=marklrh@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=marklrh@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-qg0-f52.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of marklrh@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.192.52; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marklrh@gmail.com"; x-sender="marklrh@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of marklrh@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.52 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.192.52; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marklrh@gmail.com"; x-sender="marklrh@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qg0-f52.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.192.52; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marklrh@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qg0-f52.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BtAQCZFd9VlDTAVdFdg29pgyOuYI1sAQuEaYEQAoEvPBABAQEBAQEBARABAQEBBwsLCR8wgh2CBgEBAQMBDwECER0BGx4DAQsGCRQJIQICDxICEQEFARIKBhMih3YBAwoIAwIIpUWBLz4xik4BAXCBbIJ5iikKGScNVoRZAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARQBBQ6GGYU6gk8egiWCLjsSgTEFjWGHUwkBhQWGAIM3RoZYhgeENoNQgh81gRcXhC5Rgk0BAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0BtAQCZFd9VlDTAVdFdg29pgyOuYI1sAQuEaYEQAoEvPBABAQEBAQEBARABAQEBBwsLCR8wgh2CBgEBAQMBDwECER0BGx4DAQsGCRQJIQICDxICEQEFARIKBhMih3YBAwoIAwIIpUWBLz4xik4BAXCBbIJ5iikKGScNVoRZAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBARQBBQ6GGYU6gk8egiWCLjsSgTEFjWGHUwkBhQWGAIM3RoZYhgeENoNQgh81gRcXhC5Rgk0BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,422,1437429600"; d="scan'208,217";a="143973996" Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com ([209.85.192.52]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 27 Aug 2015 15:51:22 +0200 Received: by qgeg42 with SMTP id g42so11075019qge.1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:subject :content-type; bh=5Oq+JTSXzsPHNRiMy9yB+f5+TNPfSCDOhCCdT+gwaFs=; b=xHB0qCicG38jnlb0rrNX02n5SXvmWcuj4qqr22nKVEQ5SkMMzPd3/hx/RXoXorZsiV M17lprzp89Lg7IL1ijIeUrJ8dwRlG69OXCbWLYg7scYIKgcYiUoyBc5UzTWhmhM8pywO 2hOzc8V7ZBdg2M5ej1HUx/jiBQaugqW52ELGnFqAIrZxIWKkYb55vZ4UzkMQ7GVmM9mO 3b3DailW056K60p0VrK3h+P1zoEK5A6Jaav6SyYMQugvyy/YFQ3Syc1HujnRqtWYxJr6 CvxXrfqjpeILSbUc+SZh7LMAzLrw63Lw3viyaup+8/1k+w1Pg66p7g4fiAiU/Ay6Z6aP 9Qqw== X-Received: by 10.140.195.81 with SMTP id q78mr7143168qha.49.1440683480666; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hedwig-53.prd.orcali.com (ec2-54-85-253-117.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [54.85.253.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 78sm1267049qhh.27.2015.08.27.06.51.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:51:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:51:19 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Nodemailer (0.5.0; +http://www.nodemailer.com/) Message-Id: <1440683479593.b0804981@Nodemailer> In-Reply-To: <1440683459994.1019c464@Nodemailer> References: <1440683459994.1019c464@Nodemailer> X-Orchestra-Oid: C86A6077-CBF9-44D6-B373-BE22C124192F X-Orchestra-Sig: 0d8c146991b11ffaa881b68ce3069b504a6a5dc6 X-Orchestra-Thrid: FC86A2D1-B2EF-4159-ABB4-CD95CD942674 X-Orchestra-Thrid-Sig: fee5f1b76c28164deddc26176574cfee6748a229 X-Orchestra-Account: aa832c1fa91fd5a2e758be61fa03a9a8cdf32f78 From: "Runhang Li" To: "Caml List" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1440683479791" Subject: [Caml-list] =?UTF-8?Q?Fwd=3A_Re=3A_=5BQ=5D_How_to_use_merlin_with?= =?UTF-8?Q?_mikmatch=5Fstr_=3F=E2=80=8B?= ------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1440683479791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kindly, Runhang Begin forwarded message: On Thursday, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Runhang Li , wrote: Hi, I am not maintainer of Merlin, but I think this issue may help:=C2=A0https:= //github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/issues/309 Thank you Kindly, Runhang On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764= f@gmail.com> wrote: On 08/27/2015 02:55 PM, Runhang Li wrote: > Hi, Matej >=20 > See if this issue answers your question: https://github.com/the-lambda-ch= urch/merlin/issues/358 >=20 > You can see all extensions that are being supported at src/kernel/extensi= on.ml [1] . >=20 > [1] : https://github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/blob/master/src/kernel/= extension.ml#L49 Hi, If I understand this correctly, then the support for a particular syntactic= extension need to be hardwired into merlin? Isn't that strange? (compared to tools such as: - ocamlc - ocamlopt - ocamldep - ocamldoc which need not to be sperately modified to support any new (valid) syntact= ic extension. Do they? ) Why is merlin different in this respect?= ------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1440683479791 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




Kindly,

Runhang

Begin= forwarded message:
On Thursday, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Runhang Li <marklrh@gmail.com>= , wrote:

Hi,

I am not maintainer of Merlin, but I think this issue may help: h= ttps://github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/issues/309

Thank you


Kindly,

Runhang


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a= 2e97cd764f@gmail.com> wrote:

On 08/27/2015 02:55 PM, Runhang Li wrote:
> Hi, Matej
>=20
> See if this issue answers your question: https://github.com/the-la= mbda-church/merlin/issues/358
>=20
> You can see all extensions that are being supported at src/kernel/= extension.ml [1] .
>=20
> [1] : https://github.com/the-lambda-church/merlin/blob/master/src/= kernel/extension.ml#L49

Hi,

If I understand this correctly, then the support for a particular s= yntactic extension need to be hardwired into merlin?

Isn't that strange?

(compared to tools such as:

- ocamlc
- ocamlopt
- ocamldep
- ocamldoc

which need not to be sperately modified to support any new (valid)= syntactic extension. Do they?
)

Why is merlin different in this respect?


------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1440683479791--