From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] findlib gives warning that compiler doesn't
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:36:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438788990.9319.23.camel@zotac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMu2m2Ly8i+d-c5QUybtT_B4_WjBExi0+E8pHTPJM1Rca0+n5w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1978 bytes --]
Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2015, 16:49 -0400 schrieb Ashish Agarwal:
> With the file structure shown below, assume you're in directory libb.
> Then:
>
>
> $ ocamlc -I ../liba -c a.ml
> (* no warnings *)
>
>
> $ ocamlfind ocamlc -I ../liba -c a.ml
> findlib: [WARNING] Interface a.cmi occurs in several
> directories: ., ../liba
>
>
> Why does findlib do an extra check that the compiler is okay with?
> This is causing problems in a project where I'd like to build several
> packed libraries, and one reason for doing so is precisely to reuse
> module names. Am I going about this wrong? My goal is that within
> libb, the only module from liba that should be visible is Liba.
The compiler has always been okay with multiple cmis in different
directories because the assumption is that you have full control over
the directories, and that the search path resolves any conflicts. This
is different when you use findlib. Typically you use libraries from
third parties, and cmi conflicts would remain unnoticed if findlib
didn't check.
This feature, however, is older than packed modules, and findlib doesn't
take packed modules into account. It is a little bit unclear to me how
the check could be made better. Any ideas?
Gerd
>
>
> ├── liba
> │ ├── a.cmi
> │ ├── a.cmo
> │ ├── a.ml
> │ ├── b.cmi
> │ ├── b.cmo
> │ ├── b.ml
> │ ├── liba.cma
> │ ├── liba.cmi
> │ └── liba.cmo
> └── libb
> ├── a.cmi
> ├── a.cmo
> └── a.ml
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
My OCaml site: http://www.camlcity.org
Contact details: http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage: http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-04 20:49 Ashish Agarwal
2015-08-05 15:36 ` Gerd Stolpmann [this message]
2015-08-06 19:03 ` Ashish Agarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438788990.9319.23.camel@zotac \
--to=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=agarwal1975@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox