From: "<Brad Knotwell" <knotwell@f5.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: small code problem
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:30:34 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14205.15754.427409.474325@knotwell.f5.com> (raw)
Hello all--
I'm having a problem with a core dump due to an uncaught exception.
The following snippet of code best illustrates the problem:
let usage = lazy (Printf.printf "Usage: %s file\n" Sys.argv.(0); exit ~-1);;
let filename =
try
Sys.argv.(1)
with Invalid_argument("Array.get") ->
Lazy.force usage;;
When I compile using the byte-code compiler, it seems to work fine.
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$ ocamlc junk.ml
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$ ./a.out
Usage: ./a.out file
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$
On the other hand, when I compile with the optimizing compiler, I
receive the following:
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$ ocamlopt junk.ml
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$
When I change the code slightly:
let usage = lazy (Printf.printf "Usage: %s file\n" Sys.argv.(0); exit ~-1);;
let filename =
try
Sys.argv.(1)
with _ -> (* note the pattern matching change *)
Lazy.force usage;;
I then get correct results:
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$ ocamlopt junk.ml
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$ a.out
Usage: a.out file
[knotwell@knotwell stock]$
Why do the two compilers exhibit different behaviors with the same code?
As an aside, I don't particular like my use of lazy and force. Is
there a cleaner way do the same thing?
Thanks.
--Brad
next reply other threads:[~1999-07-08 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-02 22:30 <Brad Knotwell [this message]
1999-07-08 4:56 ` Markus Mottl
1999-07-08 22:49 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-07-09 0:27 ` <Brad Knotwell
1999-07-09 1:37 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
1999-07-08 18:23 Damien Doligez
[not found] <199907090927.KAA09195@toy.william.bogus>
1999-07-09 13:56 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-07-11 19:23 ` Markus Mottl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14205.15754.427409.474325@knotwell.f5.com \
--to=knotwell@f5.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox