From: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
To: OCaml mailing-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Locally abstract type with type parameters
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:38:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408559896.43780.YahooMailNeo@web121705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> (raw)
Hi,
Consider the signature LOGGER below, to be implemented by any module that
supposedly logs something wrapped under a custom monad:
module type LOGGER =
sig
module Monad:
sig
type 'a t
val return: 'a -> 'a t
val bind: 'a t -> ('a -> 'b t) -> 'b t
end
val log: unit -> unit Monad.t
end
We now define a functor that takes a LOGGER and defines a 'process' function
that operates under the monad. But here's the twist: suppose that the function
that actually does the processing is defined elsewhere, in a module 'Foo'.
Moreover, instead of passing it the functions of the logger as independent
parameters, we deem it more convenient to pass the logger as a first-class
module:
module Make (Logger: LOGGER) =
struct
let process x = Foo.actually_process (module Logger: LOGGER) x
end
To avoid type-escaping-its-scope errors, we need to define a locally abstract
type in the implementation of 'actually_process'. Something like this:
let actually_process (type u) (module Logger: LOGGER with type 'a Monad.t = 'a u) x =
let open Logger in
let (>>=) t f = Monad.bind t f in
Logger.log () >>= fun () ->
Monad.return x
Which does not actually compile. Is it at all possible to use a locally
abstract type when that type has type parameters? And is there a solution
to this problem that does not require a) moving the implementation of
'actually_process' to the inside of a functor, or b) pass each function
of the first-class module as a separate parameter to 'actually_process'?
Thanks in advance for your time!
Best regards,
Dario Teixeira
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-20 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-20 18:38 Dario Teixeira [this message]
2014-08-21 1:19 ` John F. Carr
2014-08-22 2:23 ` Benjamin Greenman
2014-08-24 16:39 ` Leo White
2014-08-26 14:33 ` Dario Teixeira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408559896.43780.YahooMailNeo@web121705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com \
--to=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox