From: John Whitley <whitley@cse.buffalo.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: for loops with stride
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 22:21:21 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13935.15218.91076.707446@hadar.cs.Buffalo.EDU> (raw)
Thanks to everyone who responded to my earlier question re:
composition. Quite enlightening discussion... 8-)
On a hopefully less controversial note, I'd like to make a suggestion
for an addition to OCaml for-loops. Consider an optional stride
parameter, as in:
for i = 0 to n-1 by stride do
...
done
At least in certain signal processing code that I'm working with
presently, the above is a common (and highly convenient) pattern. The
corresponding while loop is simply not as easy to write or understand.
Thanks,
John
next reply other threads:[~1998-12-11 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-12-10 3:21 John Whitley [this message]
1998-12-11 15:16 Don Syme
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13935.15218.91076.707446@hadar.cs.Buffalo.EDU \
--to=whitley@cse.buffalo.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox