From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p9Q5V9wD003964
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:31:09 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtsBAH2ap04+yYwFmWdsb2JhbABCmiuPACIBAQEBAQgLCwcUJYFuAQEFPAFMC0ZXiBu0aohVBKVq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,407,1315173600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="114643544"
Received: from mx2.bouyguestel.com ([62.201.140.5])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2011 07:31:04 +0200
Received: from PNMSSS289 ([10.123.138.134]) by pnmsss289z03fe0.bouyguestel.com
 (MTA Server) with ESMTP id <0LTN00K6ARBR8C80@pnmsss289z03fe0.bouyguestel.com>;
 Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:31:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:31:00 +0200
From: Cedric Cellier <rixed@happyleptic.org>
In-reply-to: 
 <CADKNfhLnqCKHsb1PbKfxWKjNw4v00bFJrGrm0WkU1aDhA107eA@mail.gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Reply-to: Cedric Cellier <rixed@happyleptic.org>
Message-id: <1319607060.20523.11.camel@Nokia-N900>
Content-id: <1319607059.20523.10.camel@Nokia-N900>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Modest 3.2
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <CADKNfhLnqCKHsb1PbKfxWKjNw4v00bFJrGrm0WkU1aDhA107eA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Async, a monadic concurrency library

While comparing async and lwt you forget to mention performances. Didn't you run any benchmark with some result to share ? Or are Async performances irrelevant to your use cases so you never benchmarked ?