From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5GHkmNb020382
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:46:48 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmgCADBB+k3U4xEIkWdsb2JhbABShEmTUo5HFAEBAQEJCwsHFAMiiHMCsA2QdQKBKYNygQoEixKLI4sc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,376,1304287200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="111297420"
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2011 19:46:43 +0200
Received: from office1.lan.sumadev.de (dslb-094-219-220-161.pools.arcor-ip.net [94.219.220.161])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MYtKV-1Q2B9d2MwV-00VI8m; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:46:42 +0200
Received: from [192.168.5.106] (dslb-094-219-220-161.pools.arcor-ip.net [94.219.220.161])
	by office1.lan.sumadev.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 087FA5F701;
	Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:46:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: florent.ouchet@imag.fr
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4DFA2236.5010403@imag.fr>
References: <0EC5BE6E-FBB1-4B89-8362-5F9005AE7B84@inria.fr>
	 <4DFA2236.5010403@imag.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:46:40 +0200
Message-ID: <1308246400.22800.237.camel@thinkpad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:PmAAPvjRcexMaYWKCK+u8HNnnS6oomqNv5CWT+4pSM4
 08Wq8wH5VFo9AN2UZ853S47Bl7PEoaLKpKe2oGeRzcX/SR+CFJ
 HryulfCMJ1b6gaS6O42WA/mTv6ema0EUIb/THQbTgxMIW96Vol
 64zCAS7/dItR932N4gODZI4shKNWQIDYomxBrDLmBkZaBr8qsC
 sDGF0qlOKaCtK9DucRtVQ==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id p5GHkmNb020382
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 3.12.1 compatibility report

Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011, 17:33 +0200 schrieb Florent Ouchet:
> Damien Doligez a écrit :
> > vsyml: 4 lines
> >   Changes in Makefile to remove non-portable "echo -n"
> >   
> Hello Damien,
> 
> Was this incompatibility solved by using "echo $$i \\" instead of "echo 
> -n $$i"?
> If not, could you share this change?

In such cases printf is a good workaround. Exists everywhere as shell
command, is a POSIX standard, and works as usual, with full control over
newlines.

Gerd

> 
> PS: I've some patches pending for upcoming VSYML 1.8.
> 
> -- 
> Florent Ouchet
> PhD Student
> CIS/VDS Team - TIMA Laboratory
> 
> 
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Bad Nauheimer Str.3, 64289 Darmstadt,Germany 
gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de          http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
Phone: +49-6151-153855                  Fax: +49-6151-997714
------------------------------------------------------------