From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FADF7EE49
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:13:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk) identity=pra;
  client-ip=131.111.24.3;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk";
  x-sender="N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk designates 131.111.24.3 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=131.111.24.3;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk";
  x-sender="N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail.dpmms.cam.ac.uk) identity=helo;
  client-ip=131.111.24.3;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail.dpmms.cam.ac.uk";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0AAAWCN1KDbxgDl2dsb2JhbABaxjYWDgEBAQEBCBYHNQeCZoFxDIgWBJlCmDeIZJMYgQADl3uVGQ
X-IPAS-Result: Ap0AAAWCN1KDbxgDl2dsb2JhbABaxjYWDgEBAQEBCBYHNQeCZoFxDIgWBJlCmDeIZJMYgQADl3uVGQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,918,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="33121933"
Received: from mail.dpmms.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.24.3])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 17 Sep 2013 00:13:38 +0200
Received: from cpc19-cmbg14-2-0-cust477.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.6.31.222]:53885 helo=[192.168.0.3])
	by mail.dpmms.cam.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk>)
	id 1VLh35-0000zv-1l
	for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 23:13:39 +0100
From: Nicolas Ojeda Bar <N.Ojeda.Bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12B4A844-4598-4463-B5A0-AFFA520D7687@dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 23:13:41 +0100
To: "caml-list@yquem.inria.fr" <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-ACL-Warn: checking mime attachment  
X-DPMMS-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-DPMMS-Spam-Report: score -1.0 from SpamAssassin-3.3.1
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Validation-by: n.ojeda.bar@dpmms.cam.ac.uk
Subject: [Caml-list] 'compact unwind' warnings when using ocamlopt

Dear list,

I am using OS X 10.8.5 and OCaml 4.01.0 freshly compiled. When trying to
compile a project to native code using the LLVM 3.3 OCaml bindings, I get a
_long_ list of linker warnings of the form

ld: warning: could not create compact unwind for _camlUnix__close_process_f=
ull_1748: stack subq instruction is too different from dwarf stack size

What is the reason for this warning? And how can I remove it?

Thank you very much for any help!

Best wishes,
Nicolas=