From: Andre Nathan <andre@sneakymustard.com>
To: blue storm <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 help
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:14:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237652076.6137.15.camel@homesick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527cf6bc0903210826r5a0c079bm71068f5b1d89ebe1@mail.gmail.com>
Hi
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 16:26 +0100, blue storm wrote:
> This is not a camlp4-specific problem : the grammar you described
> apparently do not conform to what you have in mind.
I think I understand, although I thought the "x = expr" rule in the sum
form definition meant that before "plus" any expression would be
allowed.
I want to allow any expression inside a "sum" block, which I think I
could do by defining it as a new rule in "expr", but I'd like "plus"
expressions to only be allowed inside a "sum" block, which I'm not sure
how to do.
Thanks,
Andre
>
> According to your definition, the "sum do ... done" can only contain
> "sum" forms, not an arbitrary expression. The only valid way to parse
> "sum do let a = b in a plus c done" is thus "sum do (let a = b in a)
> plus b done", as "sum do let a = b in (a plus b) done" has an
> expression (instead of a sum) between do ... done (and a sum in expr
> position, wich is also incorrect, but it can also be parsed as a
> correct expression).
>
> What is the syntax you want to be supported ?
>
> On 3/21/09, Andre Nathan <andre@sneakymustard.com> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm just beginning with camlp4 here, and I'm stuck with what I think is
> > a precedence issue. I have the following syntax extension:
> >
> > open Camlp4.PreCast
> > open Syntax
> >
> > let sum = Gram.Entry.mk "sum"
> >
> > EXTEND Gram
> > expr: LEVEL "top"
> > [ [ "sum"; "do"; seq = LIST1 sum; "done" ->
> > <:expr< do { $list:seq$ } >> ] ]
> > ;
> > sum:
> > [ [ x = expr; "plus"; y = expr ->
> > <:expr< $x$ + $y$ >> ] ]
> > ;
> > END
> >
> > This works fine for something like this:
> >
> > sum do
> > 1 plus 2
> > done
> >
> > which becomes (1 + 2).
> >
> > However, it breaks on
> >
> > sum do
> > let a = 1 in
> > let b = 2 in
> > a plus b
> > done
> >
> > because it becomes ((let a = 1 in let b = 2 in a) + b).
> >
> > How can fix that (allowing "b" to be in scope for the second argument of
> > "plus")?
> >
> > Also, sequences of operations don't parse:
> >
> > sum do
> > 1 + 2;
> > 3 + 4
> > done
> >
> > gives "Parse error: [sum] or "done" expected (in [expr])"
> >
> > What am I missing here?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Andre
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-21 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-21 3:41 Andre Nathan
2009-03-21 15:26 ` [Caml-list] " blue storm
2009-03-21 16:14 ` Andre Nathan [this message]
2009-03-21 17:24 ` blue storm
2009-03-21 17:26 ` blue storm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-13 0:05 Andre Nathan
2009-04-13 19:08 ` [Caml-list] " Andre Nathan
2005-07-15 8:39 camlp4 help Pietro Abate
2005-07-15 20:24 ` [Caml-list] " Martin Jambon
2005-07-18 10:12 ` Hendrik Tews
2005-07-19 5:23 ` Pietro Abate
2005-07-20 7:37 ` Hendrik Tews
2005-07-20 9:57 ` Gerd Stolpmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1237652076.6137.15.camel@homesick \
--to=andre@sneakymustard.com \
--cc=bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox