From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: camlp4 on Debian lenny
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:30:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229779859.494cf393519fd@webmail.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrngkpsgv.nb0.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
Zitat von Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>:
> On 20-12-2008, Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > What is with camlp5 and camlp4?
> > Will camlp5 replace camlp4?
> > Will it afterwards be renamed to camlp4?
> > (This is, what I remember, but I'm not sure on it.)
> >
> > When will there be a consistent new way to work with this
> > tools?
> >
> > Any idea on how to fix the problem (by using official
> administration
> > tools)?
> >
>
> Well there is no problem in fact,
>
> camlp4 is the tool shipped with ocaml distribution
> camlp5 is a separate tool compatible with camlp4 before ocaml 3.10.
>
> These are 2 separate things, you are just following old tutorials
> (i.e.
> pre-3.10)
[...]
1) Where can I find the old tutorials?
2) what is camlp5 good for?
Or: what is the difference between camlp4 and camlp5?
3) is it planned that camlp4 will be thrown out of the
Ocaml-distribution?
Ciao,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-20 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-20 13:12 Oliver Bandel
2008-12-20 13:24 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-12-20 13:30 ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2008-12-20 14:06 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-12-20 17:07 ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2008-12-20 17:10 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-12-20 17:11 ` Re : " Matthieu Wipliez
2008-12-20 17:23 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-12-20 17:38 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-12-20 18:00 ` Re : " Matthieu Wipliez
2008-12-20 22:48 ` blue storm
2008-12-21 9:28 ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-12-21 13:56 ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2008-12-21 16:59 ` Richard Jones
2008-12-21 23:13 ` Oliver Bandel
2008-12-20 13:35 ` [Caml-list] " Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-12-20 13:59 ` Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229779859.494cf393519fd@webmail.in-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox