From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DF7BB84 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:58:43 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,211,1217800800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="16126686" Received: from peray.inria.fr (HELO ausone.inria.fr) ([128.93.8.98]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 14 Aug 2008 22:58:43 +0200 Received: by ausone.inria.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, _d Aug 2008 22:58:03 +0200 From: "Nicolas Pouillard" Cc: Caml_mailing list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml To: Jon Harrop References: <527cf6bc0808140450w3182b14n60764d3862b9080f@mail.gmail.com> <200808141457.47150.jon@ffconsultancy.com> In-Reply-To: <200808141457.47150.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:57:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1218747289-sup-9086@ausone.local> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1218747483-652970-40408-3131-7-="; micalg="pgp-sha1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam: no; 0.00; haskell:01 ocaml:01 haskell:01 storm:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 python:03 algorithms:03 languages:03 blue:96 aka:04 thu:05 comparison:05 anyway:05 differences:06 X-Attachments: cset="UTF-8" type="application/pgp-signature" name="signature.asc" name="signature.asc" --=-1218747483-652970-40408-3131-7-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Excerpts from Jon Harrop's message of Thu Aug 14 15:57:47 +0200 2008: > On Thursday 14 August 2008 12:50:43 blue storm wrote: ... > > and Haskell is faster than most (scripting) languages used these days > > anyway). > > Despite being written in Python, Mercurial is orders of magnitude faster than > Darcs. The difference of performances between Darcs and Mercurial is 99% due differences in algorithms not in the implementation language. So this comparison does not make sense! -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai --=-1218747483-652970-40408-3131-7-= Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkiknFcACgkQj+FCNw9dwLlgPACfWwq41M6qSIkNHT4lIS0cJ0eq /cQAnAtf4bqic04d2CvLVIqFvgtn6AcL =905+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1218747483-652970-40408-3131-7-=--