From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DB8BC6C for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:22:07 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAJApUfBMVMPfGdsb2JhbACQIA0BAQkEBimbNA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,298,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8668230" Received: from kabis.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([193.49.83.15]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2008 13:22:07 +0100 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2D112AD80; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:21:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (ras75-4-82-235-58-110.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.58.110]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9E736E5B; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:21:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Caml Community Code From: David Teller To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200802011825.43587.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <003d01c864f7$9e3c97d0$6c7ba8c0@countertenor> <200802011825.43587.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:21:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1202041307.6289.14.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; univ-orleans:01 cheers:01 camlp:01 parsers:01 trivial:01 syntax:01 camlp:01 univ-orleans:01 lifo:01 liquidations:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 lazy:02 caml:02 I confirm that you can chain several preprocessors. That's what I'm doing to achieve pattern-matching on lazy lists. Cheers, David On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 18:25 +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 01 February 2008 18:27:48 Jonathan Bryant wrote: > > I believe multiple CamlP4 parsers can be specified on the command line and > > are used in the order given. But there are a few (relatively trivial) > > syntax extensions people are commonly asking for (try ... finally is > > probably the most common), so I was suggesting that we group the most > > requested ones into a single camlp4 rather than users having to keep up > > with and constantly specify multiple camlp4s. > > Excellent idea. > -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.