From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05902BC6C for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:23:08 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAEKunEfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQKAEBAQgKKZlO X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,257,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7302591" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2008 01:23:06 +0100 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0S0N5Lx004987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:23:05 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAG+vnEfAbSoIZmdsb2JhbACQGw0LCiaZUQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,257,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8428092" Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2008 01:23:05 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id m0S0N4k8024510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:23:04 +0100 Received: (from www-data@localhost) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0S0N3pr024503 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:23:03 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: einhorn.in-berlin.de: www-data set sender to oliver@first.in-berlin.de using -f Received: from dslb-088-073-091-196.pools.arcor-ip.net (dslb-088-073-091-196.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.91.196]) by webmail.in-berlin.de (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:23:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1201479783.479d20678cba0@webmail.in-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:23:03 +0100 From: Oliver Bandel To: OCaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process References: <1201440183.6302.27.camel@Blefuscu> In-Reply-To: <1201440183.6302.27.camel@Blefuscu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 479D2069.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 univ-orleans:01 ocaml:01 cpan-like:01 -mcpan:01 perl's:01 wiki:01 imho:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 essentially:02 style:93 Hello, Zitat von David Teller : > Dear list, > > As I have mentioned in my previous message, during the OCaml > Developer > Days, the INRIA team has made clear that, among other things, the > community is essentially in charge of recommending best practices, > standards, etc. A candidate name has been suggested: "OSR", for > "OCaml > Standard Recommandations." [...] What does that mean? What means "best practices" here? I think it will be more than just recommendation of best code-indentation / coding rules-/Style. Possibly things like how to do the best way in e.g. paketizing things? (CPAN-like, I remember perl -MCPAN ... which IMHO is one of Perl's plus's.) > > While we already have a few tools for this kind of discussions, (I'm > thinking about the current mailing-list and the Cocan Wiki), at the > moment, we are lacking organisation and a way of committing to a > decision. ...hmhhh... can please elaborate more on the above stuff? Thanks, Oliver