From: "Nicolas Pouillard" <nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:56:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1200682604-sup-4908@ausone.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1200676132.4790dd24bfca9@web-mail2.uibk.ac.at>
Excerpts from christian.sternagel's message of Fri Jan 18 18:08:52 +0100 2008:
> When using `camlp4o -parser Camlp4ListComprehension' as preprocessor,
> is the resulting code the naive translation, like in,
>
> [(x, y) | x <- xs, even xs, y <- ys]
>
> =>
>
> List.flatten (
> List.map (fun x -> List.map (fun y -> (x, y)) ys) (List.filter even xs)
> )
>
> or is there an optimization in order to avoid appends and minimize the
> number of cons?
There is only a few very local optimizations.
However you can answer to your question by asking camlp4 to translate your
code and pretty-print the result.
$ camlp4o -parser Camlp4ListComprehension -str '[(x, y) | x <- xs; even xs; y <- ys]'
List.concat
(List.map (fun x -> List.map (fun y -> (x, y)) ys)
(List.filter (fun x -> even xs) xs))
As you can see List.concat is still there.
Note also that the syntax is to use `;' to separate qualifiers (generators
and filters) instead of `,' as your example.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-18 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 17:08 camlp4 Christian Sternagel
2008-01-18 18:56 ` Nicolas Pouillard [this message]
2008-01-18 19:30 ` [Caml-list] camlp4 Olivier Andrieu
2008-01-18 19:53 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-01-19 15:09 ` Christian Sternagel
2008-01-20 15:23 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-01-22 13:33 ` Christian Sternagel
2008-01-22 13:42 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-01-22 14:06 ` Loup Vaillant
2008-01-22 14:26 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-01-22 16:43 ` Christian Sternagel
2008-01-22 18:20 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2008-01-24 9:01 ` Christian Sternagel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-06 1:16 camlp4 Andy Ray
2010-02-06 11:15 ` [Caml-list] camlp4 blue storm
2010-02-06 12:14 ` Tiphaine Turpin
2010-02-06 12:44 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2010-02-09 15:30 ` Guillaume Yziquel
2010-02-09 18:29 ` Jake Donham
2010-02-07 17:19 ` Martin DeMello
2010-02-08 1:14 ` Ashish Agarwal
2010-02-08 2:01 ` Yoann Padioleau
2010-02-08 2:03 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2010-02-06 13:37 ` Ed Keith
2010-02-07 13:51 ` Joseph Young
2004-01-04 16:49 [Caml-list] novice puzzled by speed tests Xavier Leroy
2004-01-05 19:50 ` [Caml-list] camlp4 Ker Lutyn
2003-07-08 12:49 [Caml-list] -unsafe and camlp4 "Dmitry Bely"
2003-07-08 13:38 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-07-08 15:38 ` [Caml-list] camlp4 Dmitry Bely
2003-07-22 11:14 ` Damien Doligez
2003-06-10 14:22 Pierre CHATEL
2003-02-07 11:11 [Caml-list] Camlp4 Daniel de Rauglaudre
2003-02-08 0:26 ` Issac Trotts
2003-02-08 17:23 ` Geoff Wozniak
2002-05-17 13:19 Ohad Rodeh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1200682604-sup-4908@ausone.local \
--to=nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox