From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDF1BC69; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:56:15 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,176,1196636400"; d="scan'208";a="20401888" Received: from peray.inria.fr (HELO ausone.inria.fr) ([128.93.8.98]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 17 Dec 2007 12:56:15 +0100 Received: by ausone.inria.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, _d Dec 2007 12:55:22 +0100 From: "Nicolas Pouillard" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: caml-list , caml-list-bounces Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 optional arguments To: SerP References: <47663E82.40402@stork.ru> <1197889323-sup-4479@ausone.inria.fr> <47666280.3080608@stork.ru> In-Reply-To: <47666280.3080608@stork.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:55:22 +0100 Message-Id: <1197892267-sup-1884@ausone.inria.fr> User-Agent: Sup/0.3 X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 syntax:01 bug:01 syntax:01 bug:01 wrote:01 preprocessor:01 caml-list:01 ambiguous:02 revised:02 revised:02 seems:03 aka:04 dec:05 arguments:07 Excerpts from SerP's message of Mon Dec 17 12:50:24 +0100 2007: > Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > What preprocessor do you use revised syntax, original one? > > > > It seems to be a bug already fixed for the revised syntax, since it works for > > me. > > > > > Thanks, it's really works in revised syntax. If it works for you too in the revised syntax I can deduce that you were trying the original one ? > Should I post this bug? Yes, but it won't be a priority this it becomes a lot more ambiguous in original syntax. > What about a case when we use original syntax ? :-) Yes. -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai