From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8D6BC69 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:02:56 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAB8zWkfBMVMPh2dsb2JhbACPYAEBAQgKKQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.23,270,1194217200"; d="scan'208";a="5413511" Received: from kabis.univ-orleans.fr (HELO ka.univ-orleans.fr) ([193.49.83.15]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2007 15:02:56 +0100 Received: from smtps.univ-orleans.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ka.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5647912ADFD; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:02:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (ras75-4-82-235-58-110.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.58.110]) by smtps.univ-orleans.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703A636E5B; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:02:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Building a parser with Camlp4 From: David Teller To: Yitzhak Mandelbaum Cc: Nicolas Pouillard , caml-list In-Reply-To: <473A3930-912E-4050-8389-B92229B8ABC3@research.att.com> References: <1196234040.6361.7.camel@Blefuscu> <1196243387-sup-4653@port-ext2.ensta.fr> <473A3930-912E-4050-8389-B92229B8ABC3@research.att.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:02:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1197122573.6111.5.camel@Blefuscu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; parser:01 camlp:01 univ-orleans:01 parser:01 cheers:01 yitzhak:01 mandelbaum:01 javascript:98 imho:01 wrote:01 parsing:01 caml-list:01 debugging:03 library:03 wed:06 Well, with my current parser, parsing the standard library of JavaScript 2 (a few thousand lines) several minutes (with debugging code on). Which is a bit too much. So, no, I can't answer your question but yes, performance does matter. Cheers, David On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 07:38 -0500, Yitzhak Mandelbaum wrote: > A more important question (IMHO) : does it matter? I.e. how fast do > you need the parser to be?