From: Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Language trends / Caml popularity (Re: [Caml-list] Google trends)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:07:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1194019657.472b4b49b053a@webmail.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193972508.31239.82.camel@rosella.wigram>
Zitat von skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>:
[...]
>
> That's just silliness. C++ is a much better language than C for
> application development.
[...]
heheh, I met some developers, that talked this way for a long time,
but now told me, that they would prefer C over C++.
For me it was funny, because I never were a friend of C++
and instead looked for Perl, and later FPLs.
And the Java-advocating people, first making a hype out of Java,
after a while of development experience, had also talked less
advocating to this language. For me, this was also a fun, because
they needed some years of Programming Java until they had learned,
what I saw after some days/weeks of exploring.
Heheh.
One thing, that I like in OCaml-programming is,
that I don't have to type so much verbose stuff,
which other languages need.
Java for example: endless typing of class declerations
means a lot of finger-gymnastics.
But maybe this helps to avoid stiffness of the fingers,
when you are 70 ;-)
>
> I prefer Ocaml .. but hardly anyone here in Australia has even
> heard of it (even companies using *nix).
[...]
Even freshly studied computer science-people seldom know OCaml.
But I've spread the word on the Berlin's Linux-Mailinglist for a while,
and infected some of the developers with OCaml (at least that
they know there is a programming language that is called OCaml). :)
At least one of them now uses OCaml for his current project. :)
Ciao,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-02 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-01 1:02 Google trends Jon Harrop
2007-11-01 2:20 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2007-11-01 8:37 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-01 9:31 ` Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
2007-11-01 10:55 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-01 9:46 ` Richard Jones
2007-11-01 12:00 ` skaller
2007-11-01 12:46 ` Richard Jones
2007-11-01 15:45 ` skaller
2007-11-01 16:31 ` Jon Harrop
2007-11-01 18:12 ` Richard Jones
2007-11-01 19:47 ` Peng Zang
2007-11-02 3:11 ` Jon Harrop
2007-11-02 13:48 ` Lars Nilsson
2007-11-02 15:54 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-01 13:01 ` Brian Hurt
2007-11-01 16:10 ` skaller
2007-11-01 18:05 ` Richard Jones
2007-11-02 3:01 ` skaller
2007-11-02 15:50 ` Jon Harrop
2007-11-02 16:26 ` Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
2007-11-02 16:07 ` Oliver Bandel [this message]
2007-11-01 21:00 ` Dario Teixeira
2007-11-03 0:02 ` Florian Weimer
2007-11-02 22:45 ` Florian Weimer
2007-11-03 1:32 ` Jon Harrop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1194019657.472b4b49b053a@webmail.in-berlin.de \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox