From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Help me find this pdf
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:13:37 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192842817.14120.17.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710200010.53630.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 00:10 +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > 6. Nevertheless, evaluation is fully deterministic, thus it certainly
> > cannot cause Heisenbugs, neither semantically nor performance-wise.
>
> Perhaps I've missed something but surely evaluation order can alter asymptotic
> complexity? If so, moving from one compiler to another can change the
> asymptotic complexity of your program?
There's no need to do anything so radical.
GHC uses the old fashioned compile/link technology.
All you need to do is copy and paste a file into another
and use the *same* compiler to gain speed improvements.
IMHO its about time this rubbish was eliminated.
Static linkers are a legacy technology from the '70s.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-20 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-18 9:52 Tom
2007-10-18 10:33 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2007-10-18 11:01 ` Andreas Rossberg
2007-10-18 12:25 ` Jon Harrop
2007-10-18 12:40 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-10-18 13:17 ` Jon Harrop
2007-10-18 15:15 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-10-18 12:46 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-10-18 13:57 ` Jon Harrop
2007-10-18 14:22 ` Brian Hurt
2007-10-18 14:52 ` Robert Fischer
2007-10-18 15:04 ` Eric Cooper
2007-10-18 17:18 ` Jon Harrop
2007-10-19 1:16 ` skaller
2007-10-19 5:09 ` Bárður Árantsson
2007-10-19 5:23 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-10-19 5:46 ` Bárður Árantsson
2007-10-19 12:25 ` [Caml-list] " Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-19 12:47 ` Luc Maranget
2007-10-20 14:26 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-19 14:48 ` Robert Fischer
2007-10-19 21:43 ` Andreas Rossberg
2007-10-19 21:51 ` Robert Fischer
2007-10-20 13:10 ` Andreas Rossberg
2007-10-19 23:10 ` Jon Harrop
2007-10-20 1:13 ` skaller [this message]
2007-10-20 6:36 ` Tom
2007-10-21 11:17 ` skaller
2007-10-19 8:55 ` Zheng Li
2007-10-19 22:27 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-10-19 13:00 ` [Caml-list] " Brian Hurt
2007-10-19 13:49 ` Loup Vaillant
2007-10-19 14:41 ` Zheng Li
2007-10-19 23:09 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-10-18 20:07 ` Tom
2007-10-19 0:59 ` skaller
2007-10-18 20:48 ` Lauri Alanko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1192842817.14120.17.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox