From: David Teller <David.Teller@ens-lyon.org>
To: Florian Hars <hars@bik-gmbh.de>
Cc: Luca de Alfaro <luca@dealfaro.org>,
Inria Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why can't I call a function over a subclass?
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191580233.6509.26.camel@Blefuscu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4705EF58.3040605@bik-gmbh.de>
I agree with Luca that it's disconcerting.
When r is a class, I would expect
let f (x:r) (y:r) =...
to have a type such as
x :> r -> y :> r -> ...
Cheers,
David
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 10:01 +0200, Florian Hars wrote:
> Luca de Alfaro schrieb:
> > The absurdity continues:
>
> This is not absurd, this is the documented correct behaviuor.
> If *you* decide that f must only accept arguments of *exactly*
> type r, the typechecker enforces your decision, as it does if
> you decide that f may also accept subtypes of r (as long as your
> decisions are consistent within he type system).
>
> Yours, Florian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-05 7:48 Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 8:01 ` [Caml-list] " Florian Hars
2007-10-05 8:08 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 8:08 ` Fwd: " Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 11:08 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2007-10-05 11:47 ` Christophe Raffalli
2007-10-05 10:30 ` David Teller [this message]
2007-10-05 10:53 ` Zheng Li
2007-10-05 14:02 ` [Caml-list] " David Teller
2007-10-05 14:59 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 15:12 ` Luca de Alfaro
[not found] ` <20071005152130.M41697@cs.unm.edu>
2007-10-05 15:49 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 16:34 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-10-05 17:39 ` Luca de Alfaro
2007-10-05 17:49 ` Martin Jambon
[not found] ` <28fa90930710052153k2128bb63m5132455868eb2008@mail.gmail.com>
2007-10-07 22:19 ` Martin Jambon
2007-10-07 22:57 ` Classes and polymorphism (Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why can't I call a function over a subclass?) Martin Jambon
2007-10-05 19:48 ` Why can't I call a function over a subclass? Zheng Li
2007-10-06 1:49 ` [Caml-list] " Jake Donham
2007-10-09 4:18 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-10-05 8:07 ` [Caml-list] " Pietro Abate
2007-10-05 10:55 ` Andrej Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191580233.6509.26.camel@Blefuscu \
--to=david.teller@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=hars@bik-gmbh.de \
--cc=luca@dealfaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox