From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC78BC69 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:03:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ausone.inria.fr (peray.inria.fr [128.93.8.98]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l7D934dX005767; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:03:04 +0200 Received: by ausone.inria.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, _d Aug 2007 11:02:43 +0200 From: "Nicolas Pouillard" Cc: Gabriel Kerneis , "O'Caml Mailing List" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4 can't find camlp4/Camlp4Parsers path? To: Richard Jones References: <20070802160016.GA12165@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070802162011.GB12165@furbychan.cocan.org> <1186684197-sup-2846@ert.local> <20070810083503.GA14008@furbychan.cocan.org> In-Reply-To: <20070810083503.GA14008@furbychan.cocan.org> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:02:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1186995535-sup-4567@ert.local> User-Agent: Sup/0.1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 46C01E48.000 on concorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 0.000 -> 1 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46C01E48.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 camlp:01 parsers:01 0200,:01 -where:01 -where:01 usr:01 lib:01 ocaml:01 compilation:01 ocamlc:01 parsers:01 flags:01 bug:01 wrote:01 Excerpts from Richard Jones's message of Fri Aug 10 10:35:04 +0200 2007: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:30:10PM +0200, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > When did you get this kind of error? > > > > Is your camlp4 installed in the expected directory (camlp4 -where)? > > $ camlp4 -where > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlp4 > > > If it's a manual compilation command the recommended flag is > > ``-I +camlp4/Camlp4Parsers''. > > I don't understand. Are you saying that I must add this flag? I've > never had to add this flag manually before when compiling camlp4 > stuff, and nor do a lot of the packages I'm trying to install add this > flag. Sorry, this flag is required by **ocamlc** when compiling with camlp4 parsers. However camlp4 itself should not requires this kind of extra flags. It's certainly a bug, what's the exact situation? -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai