Teaching bottomline, part 2: what went right.

[David Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>]

A number of things went well, sometimes impressively.


* A number of students seem to get the hang of functional programming
(programming without side effects, returning closures, functions as
first-class citizens, recursive loops...)

* Modules seem generally rather well understood.

* The students enjoyed Graphics immensely.

* When asking students to write a specific function, it's much easier to
show examples with OCaml than with, say, Java. Consequently, exercices
are generally better understood.

* Some of the students have started answering some mathematical
questions with OCaml programs.

* One of my students did manage to write a function with type 'a -> 'b
without using Obj or Marshal. Others managed to explain me (almost)
correctly why this shouldn't be possible.

* The students seem to have understood exceptions, as well as file
management. Two things they just couldn't do at all in Java.

* Most students seem to have no problems using references when they need
them.

* I believe that students actually understand better Java now that they
have seen something a bit more abstract. Plus they had much more fun.

* #trace is good. Very good.

-- 
David Teller ------------------------------------------
Security of Distributed Systems -----------------------
-- http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
----- Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale d'Orleans