* Sample web server with nethttpd
@ 2007-03-30 14:38 Joel Reymont
2007-03-30 14:59 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joel Reymont @ 2007-03-30 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml List; +Cc: Gerd Stolpmann
I'm trying to bring up a web app as soon as possible and failing to
link Ruby with OCaml code my choice is to decouple and put an app
server behind Rails. Apache is heavy-weight so mod_caml is out of the
question. The choice is nethttpd and Ocsigen.
My OCaml app server needs to take a POST request, grab the posted
source code, translate it and spit it out. I can't figure out how to
bring up a web server with nethttpd, though.
It would be extremely helpful to have an expanded nethttpd tutorial
[1] that included a sample web server. I read through but writing
efficient code to accept connections in OCaml seems daunting and the
choice between engine and reactor unclear.
There's a sample web server in the Netplex intro, though[2], is that
sufficient? Maybe the nethttpd intro should just point to the Netplex
one.
Quoting the manual:
>>> Second, select an encapsulation.
How is this done, precisely?
>>> As mentioned, the reactor is much simpler to use, but you must
take a multi-threaded approach to serve multiple connections
simultaneously.
What's the standard (optimal) pattern here? Are there any code samples?
>> The engine is more efficient, but may use more memory (unless it
is only used for static pages).
How much more memory? Is there a rule of thumb?
How should I decide whether to pick an engine or a reactor?
>>> Third, write the code to create the socket and to accept
connections.
Should I use the netplex intro sample code?
>>> For the reactor, you should do this in a multi-threaded way (but
multi-processing is also possible). For the engine, you should do
this in an event-based way.
It appears that web servers like Lighttpd use the event-based way,
should I pick that?
Thanks, Joel
[1] http://ocamlnet.sourceforge.net/manual-2.2/Nethttpd_intro.html
[2] http://ocamlnet.sourceforge.net/manual-2.2/Netplex_intro.html
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Sample web server with nethttpd
2007-03-30 14:38 Sample web server with nethttpd Joel Reymont
@ 2007-03-30 14:59 ` Gerd Stolpmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerd Stolpmann @ 2007-03-30 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Reymont; +Cc: Caml List
Am Freitag, den 30.03.2007, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Joel Reymont:
> I'm trying to bring up a web app as soon as possible and failing to
> link Ruby with OCaml code my choice is to decouple and put an app
> server behind Rails. Apache is heavy-weight so mod_caml is out of the
> question. The choice is nethttpd and Ocsigen.
>
> My OCaml app server needs to take a POST request, grab the posted
> source code, translate it and spit it out. I can't figure out how to
> bring up a web server with nethttpd, though.
>
> It would be extremely helpful to have an expanded nethttpd tutorial
> [1] that included a sample web server. I read through but writing
> efficient code to accept connections in OCaml seems daunting and the
> choice between engine and reactor unclear.
>
> There's a sample web server in the Netplex intro, though[2], is that
> sufficient? Maybe the nethttpd intro should just point to the Netplex
> one.
Yes, the Netplex one is fully sufficient, and this is the way to go
except you have very specific needs.
The Nethttpd modules more or less provide a construction kit for web
servers. Using them require a basic understanding how servers are
constructed in general. Sorry that I cannot give a recipe.
> Quoting the manual:
> >>> Second, select an encapsulation.
>
> How is this done, precisely?
Use either the reactor module or the engine module.
> >>> As mentioned, the reactor is much simpler to use, but you must
> take a multi-threaded approach to serve multiple connections
> simultaneously.
>
> What's the standard (optimal) pattern here? Are there any code samples?
You seem to be blind. There are examples.
> >> The engine is more efficient, but may use more memory (unless it
> is only used for static pages).
>
> How much more memory? Is there a rule of thumb?
The engine needs memory buffers to store the incoming request. Depends
on the size of the requests. If you are not uploading files, you can
ignore that.
> How should I decide whether to pick an engine or a reactor?
Depends on what you can master. The engine is more difficult, you need
knowledge about event-based programming. If you don't have that
knowledge, keep away from it.
> >>> Third, write the code to create the socket and to accept
> connections.
>
> Should I use the netplex intro sample code?
Don't know how to answer this. I cannot decide for you.
> >>> For the reactor, you should do this in a multi-threaded way (but
> multi-processing is also possible). For the engine, you should do
> this in an event-based way.
>
> It appears that web servers like Lighttpd use the event-based way,
> should I pick that?
You find both approaches. Apache is multi-{processed,threaded}.
This mainly depends what you are also doing in your application.
Gerd
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany
gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
Phone: +49-6151-153855 Fax: +49-6151-997714
------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-30 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-30 14:38 Sample web server with nethttpd Joel Reymont
2007-03-30 14:59 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox