From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
To: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
Cc: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Patterns that evaluate
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:55:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171479313.24335.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45D352F2.3080003@gmail.com>
Am Mittwoch, den 14.02.2007, 12:20 -0600 schrieb Edgar Friendly:
> Jon Harrop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 February 2007 22:04, Jacques Carette wrote:
> >> I recently wrote some ocaml code which "worked", but not as I
> >> intended... The test cases I tried worked, but I should have tested
> >> harder. Apparently I was under the mistaken impression that OCaml's
> >> pattern-matching was more "first class"! So I wrote (in part):
> >>
> >> let buildsimp cast e f1 f2 = fun e1 -> fun e2 -> match (e1,e2) with
> >>
> >> | ({st = Some e}, _) -> e2
> >>
> >> and I expected it to work. Only a code review by a colleague 'found'
> >> this bug in my code.
> >>
> >> Question: would it be a difficult extension? This seemed so "natural",
> >> I just "used" the feature before it was quite there yet ;-).
> >
> > F# just introduced active patterns, which does what you want AFAIK. Of course,
> > you must disambiguate that from the OCaml's current interpretation of the
> > above (binding "e").
> >
> The two options I see are:
> 1) noting a re-binding, and automatically testing against the value of
> that previous binding
> 2) extra syntax (maybe || instead of | before active match constructs)
>
> In the first case, there's backwards compatibility issues. Wouldn't it
> be useful to have the compiler warn on such uses, to make people aware
> of rebindings performed in their code?
You are a bit quick. Before discussing syntax it is more important to
define the semantics of such patterns. I mean we have already three
predefined kinds of equality in O'Caml:
- ( == )
- ( = )
- (fun x y -> compare x y = 0)
I admit I do not prefer any one of them. So which equality should be
used to test whether the variable is equal to the matched part of the
value?
I guess this simple question is one of the reasons why such a feature is
not in the language up to now.
Gerd
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany
gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
Phone: +49-6151-153855 Fax: +49-6151-997714
------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-14 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-13 22:04 Jacques Carette
2007-02-13 22:07 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-02-14 0:10 ` Jacques Carette
2007-02-14 18:20 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-02-14 18:55 ` Gerd Stolpmann [this message]
2007-02-14 19:10 ` Denis Bueno
2007-02-14 19:11 ` Jacques Carette
2007-02-14 19:25 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-02-14 20:30 ` Edgar Friendly
2007-02-14 21:05 ` Jon Harrop
2007-02-14 21:33 ` Jacques Carette
2007-02-14 22:34 ` Martin Jambon
2007-02-15 0:26 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-02-15 3:57 ` Jon Harrop
2007-02-15 22:43 ` Don Syme
2007-02-14 20:29 ` Nathaniel Gray
2007-02-14 21:10 ` Jacques Carette
2007-02-15 3:53 ` skaller
2007-02-15 13:41 ` Jacques Carette
2007-02-15 14:10 ` skaller
2007-02-15 20:43 ` Nathaniel Gray
2007-03-07 11:15 ` Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1171479313.24335.33.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=info@gerd-stolpmann.de \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--cc=thelema314@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox