From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Polymorphic variants problem
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 10:48:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157244509.12057.29.camel@rosella.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157138993.22787.34.camel@rosella.wigram>
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 05:29 +1000, skaller wrote:
I wrote this:
> (b) annotate function arguments and returns -- if not
> all of them, focus on the top level ones: it's necessary
> for the mli file anyhow.
Now, I just tried to use my super term union, but I ran
into a problem. It looks like a fault in type inference,
something like this:
let f (x:[`A|`B]) = ..
let g (x:[`A]) = ..
..
fun x ->
f x;
g x;
..
I get a type error on g x, Ocaml is telling me x has type
[`A|`B] but is used in a context requiring a type [`A].
Of course the problem is evident: the actual type is
indeed [`A], but the first application is deducing it
to [`A|`B]. The question is: why isn't the second application
narrowing it using an intersection? [Why isn't the initial
deduction simply a bound which is further constrained?)
The actual message I got was:
File "./lpsrc/flx_lookup.ipk", line 968, characters 19-21:
This expression has type Flx_print.felix_term_t
but is here used with type Flx_ast.typecode_t
A typecode is-a term.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-03 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-01 17:31 Polymorphic variants question David Allsopp
2006-09-01 18:33 ` Chris King
2006-09-01 19:00 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2006-09-01 19:57 ` David Allsopp
2006-09-01 20:40 ` Jacques Carette
2006-09-01 18:40 ` [Caml-list] " Olivier Andrieu
2006-09-01 19:26 ` Jon Harrop
2006-09-01 19:29 ` skaller
2006-09-01 20:49 ` Andres Varon
2006-09-02 11:16 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-09-03 1:22 ` Andres Varon
2006-09-03 9:08 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-09-03 15:00 ` Andres Varon
2006-09-03 23:18 ` Jacques Garrigue
2006-09-03 0:48 ` skaller [this message]
2006-09-03 1:12 ` [Caml-list] Polymorphic variants problem Andres Varon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157244509.12057.29.camel@rosella.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox